1984
DOI: 10.1002/cne.902280212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of afferent neurones in the mesencephalic nucleus of the fifth nerve in the cat

Abstract: The objective of this study was to examine anatomically the distribution of afferent neurones in the mesencephalic nucleus of the fifth nerve (Mes V). HRP was applied, in separate experiments, to the inferior alveolar, infraorbital, and masseter nerves, and injected into the masseter muscle and periodontal ligament. Following application of HRP to the masseter muscle and masseter nerve, labelled cells were found in the ipsilateral motor nucleus of the fifth nerve and in the ipsilateral Mes V. Labelled cells in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In using graded electrical stimulation it is essential to monitor the afferent volleys from the NV entry region. Stereotaxically placed tungsten semi-microelectrodes were very convenient for this purpose (Linden, 1978;Gottlieb, Taylor & Bosley, 1984) offers a way of specifically exciting a large proportion of them without involvement of intra-dental, cutaneous or gingival afferents, provided that mental nerve branches are monitored to ensure absence of stimulus spread to their central processes in the other nuclei of NV. Concurrent stimulation of afferents from jaw-closer muscle spindle afferents also in MesV causes no problems because it is well established that they exert no direct action on digastric motoneurones (Kidokoro etal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In using graded electrical stimulation it is essential to monitor the afferent volleys from the NV entry region. Stereotaxically placed tungsten semi-microelectrodes were very convenient for this purpose (Linden, 1978;Gottlieb, Taylor & Bosley, 1984) offers a way of specifically exciting a large proportion of them without involvement of intra-dental, cutaneous or gingival afferents, provided that mental nerve branches are monitored to ensure absence of stimulus spread to their central processes in the other nuclei of NV. Concurrent stimulation of afferents from jaw-closer muscle spindle afferents also in MesV causes no problems because it is well established that they exert no direct action on digastric motoneurones (Kidokoro etal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was not known whether the cell bodies of the mechanoreceptors were in either the mesencephalic nucleus or the trigeminal ganglion. Anatomical studies in the cat (Weill, Bensadoun & de Tourniel, 1975;Chiego, Bradley, Cox & Avery, 1979;Byers & Matthews, 1981;Gottlieb, Taylor & Bosley, 1984;Byers, O'Connor, Martin & Dong, 1986) have shown neurones to be present in the periodontal ligament which have their cell bodies in either the trigeminal ganglion or the mesencephalic nucleus. However, a clear understanding of the position and distribution of the receptors themselves has not yet emerged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this finding is quite in accord with ana tomical experiments in which chromatoly sis of MeV cells, when caused by cerebel lar lesions [Brodal and Saugstad, 1965], af fected only the caudal part of the nucleus. It is in this region that the first order cell bodies of periodontal afferents are known to be concentrated as mentioned in the In troduction and recently confirmed by HRP experiments [Gottlieb et al, 1984]. So far, the evidence that it is the periodontal afferents with their first order cell bodies in the MeV, which have the direct MF pro jection, is only circumstantial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%