1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00175.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Distribution of Mycorrhizas Among Families of Vascular Plants

Abstract: SUMMARYFrom a literature search, information has been compiled on the mycorrbizal status under field conditions of 20 or more species in each of 25 families. Tbe percentage of species which are mycorrbizal ranged from 100% in seven families to 8% in Cruciferae, many families having additional species that are sometimes mycorrhizal. No family in the list was consistently non-mycorrbizal. Apart from tbe Ericaceae, tbe families were either predominantly ectomycorrbizal or predominantly VA mycorrbizal. However, al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
150
2
5

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
150
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The occurrence of AM fungi in these families agrees with the reports of Harley and Harley [40], Newman and Reddell [63], Godoy et al [37], and Zhao [86]. The presence of the Paristype predominates in ferns [76].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The occurrence of AM fungi in these families agrees with the reports of Harley and Harley [40], Newman and Reddell [63], Godoy et al [37], and Zhao [86]. The presence of the Paristype predominates in ferns [76].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Some plant families are still assumed to never or rarely form mycorrhizal associations (Newman and Reddell 1987;Tester et al 1987), such as members of the Cyperaceae, Brassicaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Juncaceae, and Amaranthaceae (Smith and Read 1997). The AM status of Cyperaceae was found to vary in different habitats of China.…”
Section: Mycorrhizal Status Of Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex cellular relationship between host roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi requires a continuous exchange of signals (reviewed by Vierheilig et al, 1998) which leads to the development of specific AM fungal structures in the roots of host plants. Most higher plants are able to form AM symbiosis with fungi of the order Glomales ; however there are contradictory reports about the mycorrhizal status of plants in the Brassicaceae (Medve, 1983 ;Harley & Harley, 1987 ;Newman & Reddell, 1987 ;Koide & Schreiner, 1992). In general the Brassicaceae are known as AM non-host plants, however recent papers report AM colonization in wild crucifers including Capsella bursa-pastoris, Coronopus didymus, Hesperis matronalis, Matthiola incana and Sisymbrium irio (DeMars & Boerner, 1994, 1995Kapoor et al, 1996).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colonization by AM fungi of glucosinolatecontaining plant species such as certain Brassica and Reseda species has been reported ; however a functional mycorrhizal association has never been proven (Medve, 1983 ;Harley & Harley, 1987 ;Newman & Reddell, 1987 ;Tester et al, 1987 ;Koide & Schreiner, 1992). Most studies have been performed on field material where the unequivocal identification of individual fungi is often difficult unless arbuscules and vesicles are formed (Harley & Harley, 1987 ;Tester et al, 1987) and therefore hyphae attributed to AM fungi might in fact be those of nonmycorrhizal fungi (DeMars & Boerner, 1995).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%