The Dual Process Model of Ideology and Prejudice: A Longitudinal Test During a Global Recession

Sibley, Chris G.; Duckitt, John

doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.757544

Cited by 80 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although such methods cannot rule out alternative explanations of observed effects, longitudinal research also supports the predicted causal pathways in which personality prospectively predicts SDO and RWA (Perry & Sibley, 2012;Sibley & Duckitt, 2010a), dangerous and competitive social worldviews predict SDO and RWA (Sibley, Wilson, & Duckitt, 2007a), and SDO and RWA predict various forms of prejudice (Asbrock, Sibley, & Duckitt, 2010;Sibley & Duckitt, 2010b;Sibley, Wilson, & Duckitt, 2007b). A more comprehensive longitudinal test also recently supported these predicted causal pathways between personality, social worldviews, and ideology (Sibley & Duckitt, 2013).…”

Section: Social and Psychological Bases Of Rwa And Sdomentioning

confidence: 85%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Dual‐Process Motivational Model of Social and Economic Policy Attitudes

Perry

Sibley

2013

Anal Soc Iss & Public Policy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The dual process model (DPM) of ideology and prejudice suggests that right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) should differentially predict support for social versus economic policies. We test a differential prediction hypothesis in which support for social policies should be predicted by RWA, and support for economic policies should be predicted by SDO. We further test a dual mediation hypothesis suggesting that RWA and SDO differentially mediate the indirect effects of distinct combinations of personality traits and social worldviews on these policy attitudes. The hypothesized model provided a reasonable fit in a large New Zealand sample (N = 6,886). Policy attitudes thus consist of at least two dimensions: social versus economic. Individual differences in these attitudes are differentially predicted by RWA and SDO-in much the same way as generalized intergroup attitudes and prejudice.

show abstract

Section: Social and Psychological Bases Of Rwa And Sdomentioning

confidence: 85%

“…Research has shown that levels of social threat (e.g., Feldman & Stenner, 1997) and competition (e.g., Dru, 2007;Sibley & Duckitt, 2013) may moderate the associations of RWA and SDO with various outcomes. Recent research has also indicated a number of individual difference factors that potentially moderate these relationships.…”

Section: Caveats and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Dual‐Process Motivational Model of Social and Economic Policy Attitudes

Perry

Sibley

2013

Anal Soc Iss & Public Policy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Indeed, CWs are not likely to change over time unless “social situations change dramatically in an apparently enduring fashion” (Duckitt & Fisher, , p. 202). Empirical studies confirm this notion and report substantial correlations between CWs measures taken at five‐month ( r = .75) or one‐year ( r = .61) time intervals (Sibley & Duckitt, ; Sibley, Wilson, & Duckitt, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 91%

When Winning is Everything: The Relationship between Competitive Worldviews and Job Applicant Faking

Roulin

Krings

2016

Applied Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Job applicant faking, that is, consciously misrepresenting information during the selection process, is ubiquitous and is a threat to the usefulness of various selection tools. Understanding antecedents of faking is thus of utmost importance. Recent theories of faking highlight the central role of various forms of competition for understanding why faking occurs. Drawing on these theories, we suggest that the more applicants adhere to competitive worldviews (CWs), that is, the more they believe that the social world is a competitive, Darwinian‐type of struggle over scarce resources, the more likely they are to fake in employment interviews. We tested our hypothesis in three independent studies that were conducted in five different countries. Results show that CWs are strongly associated with faking, independently of job applicants’ cultural and economic context. More specifically, applicants’ CWs explain faking intentions and self‐reported past faking above and beyond the Dark Triad of personality (Study 1), competitiveness and the six facets of conscientiousness (Study 2). Also, when faking is measured using a response randomisation technique to control for social desirability, faking is more prevalent among applicants with strong vs. less strong CWs (Study 3). Taken together, this research demonstrates that competition is indeed strongly associated with undesirable applicant behaviors.

show abstract

“…Longitudinal studies have shown that the Big Five personality traits predict several facets of religiousness and socio‐political attitudes in terms of RWA and SDO rather than the reverse (Perry & Sibley, ; Sibley & Duckitt, ; Wink et al, ). However, other studies that have used direction‐of‐causation modelling have not supported a directionality from basic traits to socio‐political attitudes but rather point to an interdependence due to common (e.g.…”

Section: Four Criteria Of the Differentiation Between Core And Surfacmentioning

confidence: 99%

Core and Surface Characteristics for the Description and Theory of Personality Differences and Development

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Individual differences in personality are often described on the basis of a small set of dimensional core characteristics that are commonly defined as largely consistent patterns of thoughts, feelings and actions across time and situations. Some theoretical approaches even consider them to provide the biologically founded basis for individual differences in so‐called surface characteristics such as self‐related evaluations, social attitudes, values, goals or interests, which are commonly hypothesized to be less stable or more environmentally malleable than core characteristics. We examine these hypotheses by reviewing findings about potential core and surface characteristics on the basis of four criteria: (i) level of stability in individual differences; (ii) level of heritability; (iii) direction of causation; and (iv) shared genetic variance. The results from our review call into serious question the labelling of some sets of constructs as either core or surface characteristics of personality. Although certain dimensions—often labelled as basic traits (e.g. extraversion)—are systematically linked to more specific characteristics (e.g. social attitudes and interests), the so‐called basic traits do not appear to provide an essential basis (i.e. the more stable and genetically anchored source) for these characteristics. We argue for more integrative models of personality in adulthood. Copyright © 2014 European Association of Personality Psychology

show abstract

The Dual Process Model of Ideology and Prejudice: A Longitudinal Test During a Global Recession

Cited by 80 publications

References 41 publications

A Dual‐Process Motivational Model of Social and Economic Policy Attitudes

A Dual‐Process Motivational Model of Social and Economic Policy Attitudes

When Winning is Everything: The Relationship between Competitive Worldviews and Job Applicant Faking

Core and Surface Characteristics for the Description and Theory of Personality Differences and Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About