The economic competitiveness of promising nuclear energy system: A closer look at the input uncertainties in LCOE analysis

Abstract

Summary In this study, we aimed to provide important information about the potential economic benefits and risks of nuclear electricity generation associated with existing and prevailing nuclear technologies and to examine the economic effects of nuclear fuel cycle strategies in Korea. An economic analysis model that evaluates the overall life‐cycle costs of nuclear energy systems coupled with multiple fuel cycle options was specially developed by using the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) as the fundamental methodology. This model is capable of identifying a range of techno‐economic uncertainties underlying each individual nuclear energy system taking into account the state of the art in fuel cycle technologies. It can also quantify and incorporate the resulting impacts into a system‐wide LCOE distribution for each fuel cycle option based on Monte Carlo probabilistic simulation. We analyzed and discussed examples of the economic performance of 13 promising candidates for nuclear energy systems integrated with extensive fuel cycle technologies (including one direct disposal and 12 specific reprocessing and recycling fuel cycle options). We also conducted a sensitivity analysis to investigate the major sensitivity factors of the system component cost in each fuel cycle option and their impacts on individual economic performances. Furthermore, a closer look at the techno‐economic uncertainties of advanced fuel cycle technologies in a break‐even analysis offers evidence of the potential economic feasibility and cost‐reduction opportunities in the reprocessing and recycling options relative to the direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel.

Hydrogen for Cooking: A Review of Cooking Technologies, Renewable Hydrogen Systems and Techno-Economics

“…However, this hydrogen production pathway can sustain asset impairment because of the decreasing cost of renewable hydrogen, international environment-oriented policies [17], and the reduction of investments in fossil fuel assets [209]. Furthermore, pathways such as pink hydrogen are currently implausible in the global south because of the extremely inadequate nuclear readiness levels and prohibitive capital expenditure [210][211][212][213][214]. For example, the cost of the Sizewell C nuclear power plant in the UK [215] is about 2.5 times the size of the Zambian government expenditure in 2022 [216].…”

Significant Issues of Nuclear Energy Investment Decisions for Energy Importer Countries

“…With advancing technology, nuclear reactors have become fast and more sufficient while meeting energy demand of population and industry. As, Gao, Nam, Jang, and Ko (2019) stated that Gen IV technology nuclear reac-tors are cost-effective reactors which provides nuclear fuel cycle and uranium utilization. Bedenko, Ghal-Eh, Lutsik, and Shamanin (2019) tested that Gen IV technology reactors are economical with thorium-plutonium nuclear fuel cycle and computational developments will solve nuclear power engineering.…”