2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of a prior short-term ageing on mechanical and creep properties of P92 steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microstructure analyses using SEM and TEM microscopy confirmed our previously published results from detailed microstructural investigations carried out on the same CG and UFG P92 steel. In general, it was found that the prior austenite grain boundaries were decorated by a network of mostly coarse chromium M 23 C 6 carbides, which precipitate during tempering.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microstructure analyses using SEM and TEM microscopy confirmed our previously published results from detailed microstructural investigations carried out on the same CG and UFG P92 steel. In general, it was found that the prior austenite grain boundaries were decorated by a network of mostly coarse chromium M 23 C 6 carbides, which precipitate during tempering.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Creep behavior, microstructure stability, and degradation of the creep properties of P92 steel are phenomena of major practical importance that often limit the performance of high‐temperature components. This has motivated extensive experimental creep studies and theoretical modeling of the creep mechanisms and microstructure evolution in P92 steel over the last two decades …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microstructure of the P91 steel typically consists of prior austenite grains, martensitic packets, blocks and laths, as well as the M23C6 and MX precipitates [26][27][28][29][30][31][32], which is illustrated schematically in Figure 1. The average grain size of the austenite structure varies between 10 and 60 µm, depending on the heat treatment history [33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they are good candidate materials for ultra‐supercritical (USC) power plants, which demand high temperature and pressure. P91 and P92 steel, which are typical martensitic steels, can be utilized as structural materials for power plant components at 600°C to 620°C . However, the maximum operating temperature of those components needs to increase to 625°C to 650°C to improve further the efficiency, causing the traditional materials to become unsuitable .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P91 3 and P92 steel, 6,8,9 which are typical martensitic steels, can be utilized as structural materials for power plant components at 600°C to 620°C. 3,8 However, the maximum operating temperature of those components needs to increase to 625°C to 650°C to improve further the efficiency, causing the traditional materials to become unsuitable. 10,11 The G115 steel invented recently in China has much better mechanical properties at elevated temperature than P91 and P92 steel, and it can be utilized in 625°C to 650°C USC power plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%