1992
DOI: 10.1051/rnd:19920503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of breed-type and castration on bone growth and distribution in cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Castrated males exhibit longer and more slender long bones (e.g. the metapodia), which may be identified through osteometric analyses (Davis, 2000;Shahin et al, 1992;Wilson et al, 1982). The age of castration affects the morphology of the bones and the effects on the development of the skeleton are more obvious in animals castrated at young age than animals castrated as adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Castrated males exhibit longer and more slender long bones (e.g. the metapodia), which may be identified through osteometric analyses (Davis, 2000;Shahin et al, 1992;Wilson et al, 1982). The age of castration affects the morphology of the bones and the effects on the development of the skeleton are more obvious in animals castrated at young age than animals castrated as adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, steers were 1.8 cm taller ( p = 0.03) than bulls at the hip ( Table 2 ). Castrated animals being taller than their bull counterparts at comparative ages has been previously reported [ 39 , 40 ]. The suppressed secretion of androgens with castration leads to this prolonged growth of the epiphyseal plate that results in a disproportionate increase in the long bones in castrated males [ 39 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Castrated animals being taller than their bull counterparts at comparative ages has been previously reported [39,40]. The suppressed secretion of androgens with castration leads to this prolonged growth of the epiphyseal plate that results in a disproportionate increase in the long bones in castrated males [39]. By design, animals were harvested when body weight reached 480 kg.…”
Section: The Main Effects Of Castrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the strength of castration (the “ Age, methods, and strengths of castration ” section) might affect skeletal development as it allows gradations of emasculation (Skjenneberg and Slagsvold 1979 , p 279; Paine 1994 , pp 25–28). It is probable that the differences in bone development between the groups are directly due to hormone secretion and testosterone production in particular, which is known to cause the epiphysis to fuse with the diaphysis (e.g., Short 1980 ; Shahin et al 1992 ). This leads us to think that more heavily castrated reindeer might be more affected by castration than reindeer that underwent a lighter form of castration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By reason of the observation in other ungulate species that castrated males exhibit longer and more slender long bones (e.g., Davis 2000 ; Shahin et al 1992 ), we employed Mennerich’s indices ( 1968 ). We plotted Mennerich indices 1 and 3 by calculating the smallest diaphysis breadth (SD) × 100/greatest length (GL) and distal breadth (Bd)/greatest length (GL) × 100, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%