2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of chlorine and hydrogen chloride on latent fingermark evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chlorine was produced by acidification of sodium hypochlorite solutions38 followed by washing with Millipore water to remove HCl 39. The three surface chemistry types (as‐etched, ozone‐oxidized, and furnace‐oxidized at 600 °C) were exposed to chlorine gas in an air‐tight vessel filled with laboratory air.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chlorine was produced by acidification of sodium hypochlorite solutions38 followed by washing with Millipore water to remove HCl 39. The three surface chemistry types (as‐etched, ozone‐oxidized, and furnace‐oxidized at 600 °C) were exposed to chlorine gas in an air‐tight vessel filled with laboratory air.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a separate investigation, iron oxide-based SPR was discovered to be less sensitive than molybdenum disulfide-based SPR, which was discovered to be more sensitive. (34). When iron oxide-based powder was utilized on a smooth plastic surface, there were some changes in how latent fingerprints were processed and how well developed the prints were.…”
Section: Assessment Of Spr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author reported that among the three visualization methods, white SPR was deemed the best method to visualize wet latent fingerprints. In cases where ninhydrin and cyanoacrylate fuming failed to perform, McDonald et al (2008) recognized the potential of SPR in visualizing chlorine-exposed latent fingerprints at different levels of humidity (i.e., dry nitrogen, 60% and 100% of ambient humidity). In another study, Kumar et al (2014) claimed that SPR provided sufficiently clear and identifiable quality of visualized fingerprints on metallic knife immersed in water for up to 20 days, beyond which decreased quality of visualized fingerprints was observed.…”
Section: Developments Of Physical and Chemical Fingerprint Visualizinmentioning
confidence: 99%