The Effect of Competition on Recovery Strategies

Abstract

Manufacturers often face a choice of whether to recover the value in their end‐of‐life products through remanufacturing. In many cases, firms choose not to remanufacture, as they are (rightly) concerned that the remanufactured product will cannibalize sales of the higher‐margin new product. However, such a strategy may backfire for manufacturers operating in industries where their end‐of‐life products (cell phones, tires, computers, automotive parts, etc.) are attractive to third‐party remanufacturers, who may seriously cannibalize sales of the original manufacturer. In this paper, we develop models to support a manufacturer's recovery strategy in the face of a competitive threat on the remanufactured product market. We first analyze the competition between new and remanufactured products produced by a monopolist manufacturer and identify conditions under which the firm would choose not to remanufacture its products. We then characterize the potential profit loss due to external remanufacturing competition and analyze two entry‐deterrent strategies: remanufacturing and preemptive collection. We find that a firm may choose to remanufacture or preemptively collect its used products to deter entry, even when the firm would not have chosen to do so under a pure monopoly environment. Finally, we discuss conditions under which each strategy is more beneficial.

Cascade Use and the Management of Product Lifecycles

“…Such models were not considered in the methodology development as they usually reduce the observations to closed-loop supply chains therefore by default to closed-loop systems. Nevertheless, there are limitations to these approaches because Original Equipment Manufacturers have different options to deal with returns whereof one is the destruction of returned products [45,48]. In addition, market reality may work against integrated lifecycles.…”

Optimal manufacturing/remanufacturing policies with fixed investment for the underdeveloped remanufacturing system

“…Moreover, the existence of large-scale grey recyclers increases the recycling cost of legitimate manufacturers, thereby impeding the latter from expanding their remanufacturing business. Manufacturers must invest huge funds to improve the remanufacturing system so that the adequate recyclable products can be acquired [18].…”

A structural analysis of green supply chain management enablers in the UAE construction sector

“…Hsu et al (2013) identified competition as a significant driver of GSCM. A proactive GSCM strategic planning can help a firm to gain competitive advantage (Ferguson and Toktay, 2006;Sarkis, 2003;Sharma and Vredenburg, 1998). Similarly, desire to achieve competitive advantage can act as a driver for GSCM (González-Benito and González-Benito, 2005;Rao and Holt 2005).…”