The effect of dietary yellow lupine (&lt;i&gt;L. luteus&lt;/i&gt; cv. Baryt) on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality and selected serum parameters of turkeys

Krawczyk, Magdalena; Mikulski, D.; Przywitowski, M.; Jankowski, Jan

doi:10.22358/jafs/65654/2015

Cited by 17 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of our study are in agreement with those of Mierlita (2014), Zdunczyk et al(2014), Krawczyk et al (2015), who indicated that lupine in the diet of heavy-type turkeys had no adverse effect on their body weight. However our results do not agree with Mikulski et al (2014), who indicated that the use of blue lupine in the diet had resulted in significantly higher body weight of turkeys.…”

Section: Growth Ratesupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Zdunczyk et al (2014) indicated that the slaughter value of turkeys was not affected by feeding them 6 to18% sweet yellow lupine meal in comparison with the diet containing soybean meal. This is in agreement with the studies of Krawczyk et al (2015) who carried out trials with turkeys fed 8 to 24% yellow lupine meal.…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Feeding chickens lupines or no-lupines resulted in no significant difference for the dressing percentage in the studies by Nalle (2009) (20% lupines), Morkunas et al (1995) (5-20% lupines), Olver (1987) (40% white lupine, variety 'Buttercup'), Bekric et al (1990) (23% lupine, variety 'S-14') and Orda et al (2006) (5-20% yellow lupine, variety 'Sonet'). Similar findings were observed in the studies by Witak et al (2006) on feeding duckling's 2.5-15% yellow lupine, Mierlita (2014) on feeding male turkeys 20-30% white lupine (variety 'Energy'), Mikulski et al (2014) on feeding male turkeys 6-18% blue lupine (variety 'Sonet') and Krawczyk et al (2015) on feeding female turkeys 8-24% yellow lupine (variety 'Baryt').…”

Section: Anatomic Carcass Dissection_datasupporting

confidence: 84%

“…On the contrary, Mikulski et al (2014) indicated that 18% blue lupine (variety 'Sonet') in the diet of male turkeys had resulted in significantly higher content of abdominal fat. Krawczyk et al (2015) have also found that the content of abdominal fat tended to increase when female turkeys were given 8-24% yellow lupine (variety 'Baryt'). However, Bekric et al (1990) reported that 23% lupines in the diet of chickens had influenced lower abdominal fat percent.…”

Section: Effects Of Different Amounts Of Blue Lupine (L Angustifoliumentioning

confidence: 92%

“…The studies of Mierlita (2014), Zdunczyk et al (2014) and Krawczyk et al (2015) indicated that from 6 to 30 % lupine in the turkey diets had no influence on their body weight if compared with lupine-free diets. Mierlita (2014) concluded that substituting soybean protein meals with white lupine beans in turkey broilers at a rate from 20 to 30% had no adverse effects on the slaughter indices, however, the diet containing over 30% of lupines had a negative impact on carcass features.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Effects of Different Amounts of Blue Lupine (L. Angustifolius L.) in The Diets of Heavy-Type Turkeys on Their Growth Rate, Carcass and Meat Qualities

Juodka

Nainienė

Juskiene

et al. 2017

Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A study was carried out to determine the effects of soybean meal replacement with different amounts of blue lupine in the diets of turkeys on the growth rate, anatomic carcass dissection data, chemical indicators of breast and thigh muscles and the content of tryptophan and oxyprolin. In total three hundred and sixty cross BIG-6 turkeys were allotted to two control and ten experimental groups of 30 one-dayold turkeys. The control group of turkeys was fed the diet containing soybean meal, whereas the trial groups were offered different amounts (from 20 to 30%) of lupines. Group 4 and 5 were additionally given probiotic mixture Bio Plus 2B and allzyme SSF, respectively. Soybean oil replacement from 20 to 30% lupine in the diet had no influence on the growth rate, dressing percentage, edible parts and abdominal fat content of turkeys. The study indicated that lupines in the diet of turkeys had a different effect on the meat quality of different genders. Lupines did not have any negative effect on the meat quality of female turkeys and 30% lupines even improved the protein value index of breast muscles. However, 20-30 and 25-30% lupines in male turkey diets lowered dry matter and protein contents in breast muscles but had no negative influence on the main quality indicators in thigh muscles. The results of the study showed that the negative effect on the male breast muscle quality might be avoided using Bio Plus 2B or allzyme SSF additives in the male diets containing 30% lupines.

show abstract