2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-014-2572-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Forging Variables on the Supersolvus Heat-Treatment Response of Powder-Metallurgy Nickel-Base Superalloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The occurrence of superplastic flow for LSHR (and, as will be discussed below, for IN-100) may seem surprising in view of the coarse gamma grain size (~15 to 20 lm) for the program materials. However, a comparison of the present results with those for the same alloys with gamma grain sizes of~2 to 3 lm [21] revealed an approximately two-orders-of-magnitude reduction in the strain rate at which the transition from PLC to superplastic flow had occurred. The observed trend noted here was thus at least qualitatively similar to the typical effect of grain size on the strain rate required for superplastic flow.…”
Section: A Stress-relaxation-test Resultssupporting
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The occurrence of superplastic flow for LSHR (and, as will be discussed below, for IN-100) may seem surprising in view of the coarse gamma grain size (~15 to 20 lm) for the program materials. However, a comparison of the present results with those for the same alloys with gamma grain sizes of~2 to 3 lm [21] revealed an approximately two-orders-of-magnitude reduction in the strain rate at which the transition from PLC to superplastic flow had occurred. The observed trend noted here was thus at least qualitatively similar to the typical effect of grain size on the strain rate required for superplastic flow.…”
Section: A Stress-relaxation-test Resultssupporting
confidence: 42%
“…[17,18] The program materials were identical to those used in several previous investigations of the thermomechanical processing of PM superalloys. [19][20][21] The LSHR material consisted of 230-mm-diameter extruded billet produced by Special Metals (Princeton, KY). Its composition is given in Table I; its processing history is summarized in detail in References 19 and 20.…”
Section: A Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method will also result in the exclusion of c grains sectioned far from their centroids and has limitations. [12] Therefore, in case of _ e ¼ 1 s À1 ; the intergranular incoherent c¢ precipitates are not delineated from c grains and for a collection of 479 grains, the average grain size is 1.46 lm, with a maximum of 5.4 lm and minimum of 0.5 lm and which includes averages of c and c¢ precipitates. In case of _ e ¼ 10 s À1 ; this becomes less reliable given the smaller distribution of grains, i.e., 145 grains and the marked increase in intragranular incoherent c¢ precipitates.…”
Section: B Nucleation and Growth Of Primary Gamma Prime Precipitatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,[5][6][7][8][9][10] The evolution of the c¢ precipitate morphology is influenced by the stress, plastic strain, and most importantly the strain rate. [4,11,12] The 1st population termed as primary c¢ has the principal role of inhibiting grain growth during billet manufacture and forging by pinning the grain boundaries and are typically, 1 to 5 lm in size. [13] Thermomechanical operations carried out at temperatures where only these pinning particles are present in the microstructure (absence of secondary/tertiary populations, as they have lower solvus temperature compared to forging temperature) can be therefore carried out at decreased flow stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation