1941
DOI: 10.1088/0959-5309/53/6/306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of grain direction on the Young's moduli and rigidity moduli of beech and sitka spruce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, since most of the available elastic moduli data presented in literature were measured in static tests, the comparison of the measurement results obtained in this study with literature data involves a comparison of different measurement techniques. However, the comparison with shear moduli values obtained in static tests at around 12 % wood MC (Stamer and Sieglerschmidt 1933;Hearmon and Barkas 1941) reveals reasonable similarity. Moreover, the values are in good agreement with shear moduli measured with the ultrasonic technique by Bucur and Archer (1984) and moisture-dependent shear moduli published recently by Hering et al (2012).…”
Section: Elastic Modulimentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, since most of the available elastic moduli data presented in literature were measured in static tests, the comparison of the measurement results obtained in this study with literature data involves a comparison of different measurement techniques. However, the comparison with shear moduli values obtained in static tests at around 12 % wood MC (Stamer and Sieglerschmidt 1933;Hearmon and Barkas 1941) reveals reasonable similarity. Moreover, the values are in good agreement with shear moduli measured with the ultrasonic technique by Bucur and Archer (1984) and moisture-dependent shear moduli published recently by Hering et al (2012).…”
Section: Elastic Modulimentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Poisson's ratios (-) Hearmon and Barkas (1941) 3. Stamer and Sieglerschmidt (1933), b shear moduli at x = 12.5 % technique presented in this study, in most investigations, a simplified equation is used to calculate the Young's moduli:…”
Section: Elastic Modulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, especially in the case of hardwoods, complete data sets for the three main anatomical directions rarely exist that are sufficient for static calculations and modeling in wood construction, and for calculations on multilayered boards, parquet, or musical instruments with the finite element (FE) method. Several studies about grain angle dependencies were published, for example, by Hearmon and Barkas (1941), Suzuki and Sasaki (1990), Kabir et al (1997), Reiterer and StanzlTschegg (2001), Liu (2002), andYoshihara (2009). A comprehensive work about grain and ring angle dependent compression strength and elasticity was presented by Lang et al (2002), and the angle dependent elastic behavior within the RT plane of softwoods was investigated by Hearmon (1948), Kennedy (1968), and Garab et al (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the grain angle dependencies were the focus of diverse studies (e.g., Hearmon and Barkas 1941;Suzuki and Sasaki 1990;Kabir et al 1997;Holmberg 2000;Liu 2002;Reiterer and Stanzl-Tschegg 2001;Yoshihara 2009), information on the angle-dependent elastic behavior within the RT plane is rather scarce for softwoods [for hardwoods, grain and ring angle-dependent compression tests were carried out by Lang et al (2002)]. One reason for this could be that preparation of specimens with orthotropic mechanical properties might be hampered due to the influence of the growth ring curvature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%