1987
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90070-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of grating spatial frequency on the early VEP-component CI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of visual processing can also be inferred from latency of the visual evoked potential (VEP). VEP latency increases monotonically with increasing spatial frequency and a two-mechanism model has also been proposed to account for the increase in processing time (Parker & Salzen, 1977;Vassilev et al, 1983;Vassilev & Stomonyakov, 1987). In support of this claim, onset and offset VEP responses, which parallel the bimodal RT distributions, are only observed at low spatial frequencies (2 cycle/deg and below); middle and high spatial-frequency stimuli do not produce offset responses (Vassilev & Strashimirov, 1979;Vassilev et al, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rate of visual processing can also be inferred from latency of the visual evoked potential (VEP). VEP latency increases monotonically with increasing spatial frequency and a two-mechanism model has also been proposed to account for the increase in processing time (Parker & Salzen, 1977;Vassilev et al, 1983;Vassilev & Stomonyakov, 1987). In support of this claim, onset and offset VEP responses, which parallel the bimodal RT distributions, are only observed at low spatial frequencies (2 cycle/deg and below); middle and high spatial-frequency stimuli do not produce offset responses (Vassilev & Strashimirov, 1979;Vassilev et al, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…VEP latency increases monotonically with increasing spatial frequency and a two-mechanism model has also been proposed to account for the increase in processing time (Parker & Salzen, 1977;Vassilev et al, 1983;Vassilev & Stomonyakov, 1987). VEP latency increases monotonically with increasing spatial frequency and a two-mechanism model has also been proposed to account for the increase in processing time (Parker & Salzen, 1977;Vassilev et al, 1983;Vassilev & Stomonyakov, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An integrative masking explanation, in which it is argued that the emerging perception of the low spatial frequencies in the degraded image become integrated with the perception of the wider band of spatial frequencies contained in the change-back image, seems more plausible. Given that low spatial frequencies tend to be processed earlier than high spatial frequencies (Schyns & Oliva, 1993;Vassilev & Stomonyakov, 1987), with an early enough change-back, the integration of lower and higher spatial frequency information in the two image versions might be seamless. Therefore, integrative masking of the change image by the change-back image might explain part of the postsaccadic suppression observed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in spatial vision suggests that our visual system utilizes spatial frequency channels , which differentially process visual information carried in specific bands of spatial frequencies (Campbell & Robson, 1968; DeValois & DeValois, 1980; De Valois, Yund, & Hepler, 1982; Schyns & Oliva, 1994; Vassilev & Stomonyakov, 1987). The term “spatial frequency” (SF) is a measurement of the number of cycles of a sine wave in a given unit of space, and in the study of visual perception, SFs are often used as a means of measuring the limits of the visual system.…”
Section: Different Spatial Frequencies Have Different Perceptual Usesmentioning
confidence: 99%