1971
DOI: 10.3109/17453677108989058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Growth Hormone on the Healing of Experimental Bone Defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this we used 4-6 month-old rabbits. Such observations also reported by Herold, (1971) who was the first to described this model. The rabbit also is a well-established animal model in the field of BMP research (Zegzula et al, 1997;Texeira and Urist, 1998;Yuehuei and Friedman, 1999).…”
Section: In Vivo Evaluation Of the Osteoblast Seeded Cockle Shell-bassupporting
confidence: 60%
“…For this we used 4-6 month-old rabbits. Such observations also reported by Herold, (1971) who was the first to described this model. The rabbit also is a well-established animal model in the field of BMP research (Zegzula et al, 1997;Texeira and Urist, 1998;Yuehuei and Friedman, 1999).…”
Section: In Vivo Evaluation Of the Osteoblast Seeded Cockle Shell-bassupporting
confidence: 60%
“…It was then placed in a prone position. Using a posterior approach, its forelimbs were incised longitudinally, the shaft of the radius was exposed and using a string saw, a 15-mm bone defect was created (Herold et al 1971). The periosteum of the bone defect area was completely removed and the skin and subcutaneous tissue were carefully sutured after inserting the autologous osteoblasts or bone-marrow-derived autologous MSCs combined with allogeneic cancellous bone granules.…”
Section: Formation Of the Bone Defectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has therefore been hypothesised that GH may have a role in enhancement of fracture healing and a number of animal studies have demonstrated that GH stimulates bone formation (4-6), whereas others have shown no such response (36)(37)(38). This discrepancy has been explained by a variety of experimental designs used, the GH dosage and the animal species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%