1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6826(97)00022-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of ionospheric inhomogeneity on magnetic pulsation polarization: Magnetic disturbance on the ground as a function of inhomogeneity magnitude

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To summarize, the complexity in polarization pattern might be due to (1) the horizontal inhomogeneity of the ionospheric conductivity [ Hayashi et al , 1981; Belova et al , 1997] or the ground conductivity [ Fraser , 1975b]; (2) waves with multiple frequency components from different injection regions; (3) superposition effects through refraction, reflection, and transmission in the waveguide [ Altman and Fijalkow , 1980]; (4) at high latitudes, the array is located close to the wave injection region where the superposed effect of incident waves and ducted waves is more dominant [ Hayashi et al , 1981; Kim et al , 2010]; and (5) polarization change of EMIC waves during propagation in the magnetosphere [ Young et al , 1981; Horne and Thorne , 1993; Meredith et al , 2003; Hu and Denton , 2009].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To summarize, the complexity in polarization pattern might be due to (1) the horizontal inhomogeneity of the ionospheric conductivity [ Hayashi et al , 1981; Belova et al , 1997] or the ground conductivity [ Fraser , 1975b]; (2) waves with multiple frequency components from different injection regions; (3) superposition effects through refraction, reflection, and transmission in the waveguide [ Altman and Fijalkow , 1980]; (4) at high latitudes, the array is located close to the wave injection region where the superposed effect of incident waves and ducted waves is more dominant [ Hayashi et al , 1981; Kim et al , 2010]; and (5) polarization change of EMIC waves during propagation in the magnetosphere [ Young et al , 1981; Horne and Thorne , 1993; Meredith et al , 2003; Hu and Denton , 2009].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Hayashi et al [1981] and Kim et al [2010] reported greater variation of the polarization pattern at high latitudes, suggesting it might be attributed to the array being located close to the wave injection region where the combination of incident waves and ducted waves is more dominant. A theoretical approach by Belova et al [1997] showed how the polarization pattern on the ground can change in a complex fashion as the inhomogeneity of ionospheric conductivity varies. There have been studies of Pc1–2 waves indicating various source regions near the magnetospheric layer, the plasmapause, plasma mantle, and/or the cusp [e.g., Menk et al , 1992; Popecki et al , 1993; Neudegg et al , 1995; Dyrud et al , 1997; Engebretson et al , 2005] and the latitudinal extent of 0.5° to 1° in ILAT [e.g., Mursula et al , 1994a; Erlandson et al , 1996; Yahnin and Yahnina , 2007; Engebretson et al , 2008].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also found that wave properties show different characteristics for different latitudes and MLTs. These complex wave properties can be attributed to either (1) inhomogeneous ionospheric conductivity (Belova et al, 1997;Kim et al, 2010) or (2) interference between the incident and ducted waves (Hayashi et al, 1981). According to theoretical studies (Denton, 2018;Hu et al, 2010;Hu & Denton, 2009;Johnson & Cheng, 1999;Kim & Johnson, 2016;Omidi et al, 2013), the wave properties can change while propagating from the source region to the ionosphere.…”
Section: Wave Properties Dependent On Mlt and Latitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superposition effects through refraction, reflection, and transmission in the waveguide can also be considered. A model study by Belova et al [1997] showed how the polarization pattern on the ground can change in a complicated fashion as the inhomogeneity of the ionospheric conductivity varies. Hayashi et al [1981] reported greater variation of polarization properties at high latitudes and suggested that the lack of uniformity in the polarization pattern appeared to be related to the fact that the array is located close to the wave injection region where the combination of incident waves and ducted waves is more dominant.…”
Section: Observations and Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%