# These authors contributed equally to this work. metabolic profiles through analyzing complex biofluids (e.g., urine and plasm) can provide important diagnostic and prognostic information [8]. Among the biofluids most commonly analyzed in metabolomic studies, urine appears to be particularly useful, because it is abundant, readily available, easily stored and can be collected by simple, noninvasive techniques [9]. Although, persistent alterations induced by dietary or chronic interventions may also be detected from plasma, but it just provides a description of the metabolic system at the time of sampling, and yet some biochemical or pathological changes may not be specific to external stimuli or genetic modification. By contrast, information from urine is time-averaged because of its collection and storage in the bladder [8]. Therefore, urine was selected to conduct metabolic mapping in many publications [10][11][12]. Among analytical techniques used in metabonomics, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [13] and mass spectroscopy (MS) [14] possessed the dominant status. As known, NMR has the advantage of being rapid, high reproducibility, nondestructive to samples, applicable to intact biomaterials and rich in chemical structural information. In addition, unlike GC-MS and certain liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods,