2013
DOI: 10.1016/s2095-6339(15)30039-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of reforestation on stream flow in Upper Nan river basin using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, upland farming accelerates hydraulic and tillage erosion, concentrates overland flow and erosion into the stream network (Ziegler et al, ), and intensifies high peak flows in the rivers and thus may aggravate flooding in the densely populated and cultivated plains. However, simulations have indicated that the historical forest loss in Nan only increases wet season flow streamflow by 2% (Wangpimool, Pongput, Sukvibool, Sombatpanit, & Gassman, ), suggesting a weak impact of deforestation on flooding downstream. Moreover, scientific research in the Himalayan region has shown that the hydrological impacts of upland deforestation are scale‐dependent; while the impact can be significant at the small‐scale level and/or the location close to the floodplains, it is not significant at the large scale or the plains far downstream (Hofer, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, upland farming accelerates hydraulic and tillage erosion, concentrates overland flow and erosion into the stream network (Ziegler et al, ), and intensifies high peak flows in the rivers and thus may aggravate flooding in the densely populated and cultivated plains. However, simulations have indicated that the historical forest loss in Nan only increases wet season flow streamflow by 2% (Wangpimool, Pongput, Sukvibool, Sombatpanit, & Gassman, ), suggesting a weak impact of deforestation on flooding downstream. Moreover, scientific research in the Himalayan region has shown that the hydrological impacts of upland deforestation are scale‐dependent; while the impact can be significant at the small‐scale level and/or the location close to the floodplains, it is not significant at the large scale or the plains far downstream (Hofer, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, scientific research in the Himalayan region has shown that the hydrological impacts of upland deforestation are scale‐dependent; while the impact can be significant at the small‐scale level and/or the location close to the floodplains, it is not significant at the large scale or the plains far downstream (Hofer, ). As for the dry season stream flow, it is simulated to decrease by 20% as a result of the historical forest loss in Nan Province (Wangpimool et al, ), indicating the widespread upland deforestation may intensify water shortages during the dry season in MSEA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model is widely applied for LULC change analysis and ecosystem services evaluation [30,31], and for the simulation of agroforestry [14] and reforestation interventions [32]. Input data required are represented by: meteorological data, topography, soil, and land use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…deforestation) increased water yields both annually and in the wet season in the Mae Chaem River basin in the northwestern CP. Wangpimool et al (2013) showed that streamflow was reduced in the wet season and increased in the dry season due to reforestation in the watershed in the upper Nan River basin using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%