2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Resonance Tubes on Glottal Contact Quotient With and Without Task Instruction: A Comparison of Trained and Untrained Voices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
33
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…With this finding, it is clear that the technique does not promote hypertension of the vocal apparatus, which is consistent with indications from the literature of improved efficiency and vocal economy, reducing the level of phonation pressure and less effort vocal [1][2][3][5][6][7][8][9] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…With this finding, it is clear that the technique does not promote hypertension of the vocal apparatus, which is consistent with indications from the literature of improved efficiency and vocal economy, reducing the level of phonation pressure and less effort vocal [1][2][3][5][6][7][8][9] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, both inter-and intravariability were great. In a recent study on effects of tube phonation in two groups of male subjects, 10 with no vocal training and 10 with classical vocal training, Gaskill and Quinney (2012) noted an increase of CQ during tube phonation in almost all subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the lack of research evidence has made the method little known outside of Finland. Studies by several authors who follow the technique created by Sovijärvi (7)(8)(9)(10) indicate it is highly beneficial in vocal therapy for treating numerous types of vocal fold disorders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%