2016
DOI: 10.5301/jabfm.5000302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Scaffold Pore Size in Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Abstract: Introduction: The effect of scaffold pore size and interconnectivity is undoubtedly a crucial factor for most tissue engineering applications. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of pore size and porosity on cartilage construct development in different scaffolds seeded with articular chondrocytes. Methods: We fabricated poly-L-lactide-co-trimethylene carbonate scaffolds with different pore sizes, using a solvent-casting/particulate-leaching technique. We seeded primary bovine articular chondrocytes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
88
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
88
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the results obtained by swelling tests pointed out that, when immersed in PBS, the membranes rapidly swell and adsorb considerable liquid amounts immediately after soaking (Figure a). These results are in line with recent research studies stressing the importance of the porosity of polymeric scaffolding materials for cartilage repair applications and pointing out the importance of porous materials to guide the regeneration of a functional tissue (Browe et al, ; Nava, Draghi, Giordano, & Pietrabissa, ; Song et al, ). One of the advantages of the proposed system is that membranes formulation can be tailored to deliver variable amounts of the bioactive polysaccharide CTL at the lesioned site.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In fact, the results obtained by swelling tests pointed out that, when immersed in PBS, the membranes rapidly swell and adsorb considerable liquid amounts immediately after soaking (Figure a). These results are in line with recent research studies stressing the importance of the porosity of polymeric scaffolding materials for cartilage repair applications and pointing out the importance of porous materials to guide the regeneration of a functional tissue (Browe et al, ; Nava, Draghi, Giordano, & Pietrabissa, ; Song et al, ). One of the advantages of the proposed system is that membranes formulation can be tailored to deliver variable amounts of the bioactive polysaccharide CTL at the lesioned site.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this study by adding the GAG to gelatin in scaffold composition we try to increase the attachment and proliferation. GAG in combination with gelatin in nanofiberous structure and highly porosity can have a great impact on attachment potential of the scaffolds . SEM images approve that G/GAG nanofiber structure is deferent from gelatin nanofibers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The pore size of a scaffold microarchitecture affects cell adhesion, which significantly influences cell interactions, migration, growth and differentiation. Both larger (>200 µm) and smaller (≤200 µm) pore sizes promote cell proliferation (Griffon et al, 2006;Nava et al, 2016;Kim et al, 2017), while larger pore sizes are more favorable for chondrogenesis (Oh et al, 2010).…”
Section: Pore Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, polycaprolactone (PCL) (Figure 5A) cylindrical scaffolds with larger pore size (370-400 µm) increased Collagen type II, sox-9, GAG content and GAG/DNA index, while inhibited Collagen type I and X expression in ADSC in vitro (Oh et al, 2010;Im et al, 2012; Figure 5B). However, scaffolds made from poly(urethane urea) showed contradictory outcome, in which larger pore size (300-500 µm) downregulated proteoglycan production and Collagen type II expression but promoted Collagen type I expression (Stenhamre et al, 2011;Nava et al, 2016). The well permeability of nutrients and oxygen of scaffold provides sufficient supply for stem cells and leads to better chondrogenic differentiation (Oh et al, 2010).…”
Section: Pore Sizementioning
confidence: 99%