2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-021-01681-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Two Dietary Protein Sources on Water Quality and the Aquatic Microbial Communities in Marron (Cherax cainii) Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Environmental factors shape the gut microbiota of aquatic animals. Feeding with different diets can influence diverse microbial populations in water wherein bacteria such as Clostridium , Hafnia and Lactobacillus have beneficial impacts on the health and immunity of aquatic animals and restoration of core gut microbiota (Nguyen et al ., 2021). Furthermore, rearing water quality variables including organic waste accumulation can influence the bacterial interaction between the gut and the rearing environment in commercial aquaculture practices (Giatsis et al ., 2015; Dehler et al ., 2017; Nguyen et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Environmental factors shape the gut microbiota of aquatic animals. Feeding with different diets can influence diverse microbial populations in water wherein bacteria such as Clostridium , Hafnia and Lactobacillus have beneficial impacts on the health and immunity of aquatic animals and restoration of core gut microbiota (Nguyen et al ., 2021). Furthermore, rearing water quality variables including organic waste accumulation can influence the bacterial interaction between the gut and the rearing environment in commercial aquaculture practices (Giatsis et al ., 2015; Dehler et al ., 2017; Nguyen et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feeding with different diets can influence diverse microbial populations in water wherein bacteria such as Clostridium , Hafnia and Lactobacillus have beneficial impacts on the health and immunity of aquatic animals and restoration of core gut microbiota (Nguyen et al ., 2021). Furthermore, rearing water quality variables including organic waste accumulation can influence the bacterial interaction between the gut and the rearing environment in commercial aquaculture practices (Giatsis et al ., 2015; Dehler et al ., 2017; Nguyen et al ., 2021). For instance, static water conditions with no water exchange or recirculation can transfer more bacteria from surrounding water into the gut of fish, compared to continuous flow‐through systems (Giatsis et al ., 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rearing water harbors diverse and different groups of bacteria ( Qin et al, 2016 ), suggesting little or no correlation to the fish gut bacterial communities ( Giatsis et al, 2015 ; Zeng et al, 2020 ). The gut microbial signatures in the juvenile stage are considered a valuable indicator of fish health and immunity ( Talwar et al, 2018 ), and the composition of gut bacteria is highly influenced by dietary intervention ( Parata et al, 2020 ; Nguyen et al, 2021 ; Serra et al, 2021 ). Since the water quality and other experimental parameters like temperature, pH, salinity, and dissolved oxygen remained constant throughout the trial, the shift of microbial communities in the gut of fish in this study primarily arises from the PAH- and metal-enriched diets used to feed juvenile L. calcarifer .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the current high‐density agriculture strategy, going after a high yield has the unintended effect of hastening the degradation of water quality (Abedin et al, 2017; Anusuya et al, 2017). The increase in nitrogen and phosphorus metabolites in the breeding environment, which is directly connected to the high protein content in the feed and the use of nitrogen and phosphorus, is often what leads to the degradation of water quality (Avnimelech, 1999; Ebeling et al, 2006; Nguyen et al, 2021). During cultivation, we monitored changes in water quality, and indices including pH (6.8–7.9), pX (1.8–2.8) and dissolved oxygen were all within reasonable ranges (Carlson, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%