2019 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshop (ASEW) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/asew.2019.00031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Weighted Moving Windows on Security Vulnerability Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We argue, supported by our empirical analyses, that MCMC modeling based on the introduced step‐by‐step Bellwether method can be used to leverage the BMW resulting in relatively higher prediction accuracy for new project cases. A generalization of the finding of a significant effect of using moving windows remains an open challenge since a variety of chronological datasets,* modeling approaches and accuracy measures have been considered in previous studies 18,23–27 . In some cases, improved prediction accuracy was not achieved 26 ; in two of our previous studies, 15,17 it was found that the BMWs sampled (from the ISBSG, Desharnais, and Kitchenham datasets) did result in improved prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We argue, supported by our empirical analyses, that MCMC modeling based on the introduced step‐by‐step Bellwether method can be used to leverage the BMW resulting in relatively higher prediction accuracy for new project cases. A generalization of the finding of a significant effect of using moving windows remains an open challenge since a variety of chronological datasets,* modeling approaches and accuracy measures have been considered in previous studies 18,23–27 . In some cases, improved prediction accuracy was not achieved 26 ; in two of our previous studies, 15,17 it was found that the BMWs sampled (from the ISBSG, Desharnais, and Kitchenham datasets) did result in improved prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A generalization of the finding of a significant effect of using moving windows remains an open challenge since a variety of chronological datasets,* modeling approaches and accuracy measures have been considered in previous studies. 18,[23][24][25][26][27] In some cases, improved prediction accuracy was not achieved 26 ; in two of our previous studies, 15,17 it was found that the BMWs sampled (from the ISBSG, Desharnais, and Kitchenham datasets) did result in improved prediction accuracy. Although previous study 15 made use of three datasets (ISBSG-projects in the Communication sector, Desharnais and Kitchenham), it only used a single learner, namely, deep neural networks (DNN) to predict the software effort.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%