2010
DOI: 10.1089/pho.2008.2301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Low Level Laser Irradiation on Gingival Inflammation

Abstract: A general conclusion can be drawn that low level laser irradiation (semiconductor, 670 nm) can be used as a successful physical adjuvant method of treatment, which, together with traditional periodontal therapy, leads to better and longer-lasting therapeutic results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
43
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
43
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Kreisler (2005) the greatest reduction in the degree of tooth mobility and probing depth in the group of patients who underwent SRP + laser therapy can be mainly attributed not to the killing of bacteria in periodontal pockets, but rather to the complete removal of infected sulcular epithelium, which leads to greater attack of the connective tissue (33). Furthermore, the removal of granulation tissue infected promotes the healing of connective tissue with a decrease in probing depth, gingival index and tooth mobility and a recovery of clinical attacks significantly higher compared to the initial preparation only (33)(34)(35)(36); these results, in addition to being the best, are longer lasting and more stable over time (37). However, according to De Micheli (2011) the results of the two therapeutic procedures are similar with regard to plaque index and bleeding on probing, for which laser therapy does not lead to additional benefits (38).…”
Section: Middle Value Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Kreisler (2005) the greatest reduction in the degree of tooth mobility and probing depth in the group of patients who underwent SRP + laser therapy can be mainly attributed not to the killing of bacteria in periodontal pockets, but rather to the complete removal of infected sulcular epithelium, which leads to greater attack of the connective tissue (33). Furthermore, the removal of granulation tissue infected promotes the healing of connective tissue with a decrease in probing depth, gingival index and tooth mobility and a recovery of clinical attacks significantly higher compared to the initial preparation only (33)(34)(35)(36); these results, in addition to being the best, are longer lasting and more stable over time (37). However, according to De Micheli (2011) the results of the two therapeutic procedures are similar with regard to plaque index and bleeding on probing, for which laser therapy does not lead to additional benefits (38).…”
Section: Middle Value Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Veliki broj autora koristi doze u rasponu od 0,001-0,01J/cm 2 iako je još 1971. godine Mester sugerisao da je neophodna doza od 1-2 J/cm 2 za zarastanje rana. [21][22][23] U ovom istraživanju korišćene su doze približne terapeutskim dozama Mestera. Primenjeni laser je imao izlaznu snagu od 5 mW, a ekspozicija je bila 6,5 minuta po svakom ispitivanom području.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…20,23 Uočeno je da dodatno zračenje laserom male snage daje bolje terapeutske rezultate nego samostalno uklanjanje kamenca i konkremenata uz kiretažu parodontalnih džepova. 20 Istraživači su istakli da je efekat LLLT bio najveći na nivou smanjenja gingivalnog indeksa i smanjenja dubine sondiranja.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations