2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of stress on alcohol consumption: mild acute and sub-chronic stressors differentially affect apomorphine susceptible and unsusceptible rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, an extensive body of research has linked both physical and psychosocial stressors to alcohol consumption in humans and experimental animals (Pohorecky, 1981, 1990, 1991; Sillaber and Henniger, 2004). This research area is rather complex, however, as stress has been reported to either increase or decrease voluntary ethanol intake, depending on numerous situational and organismal factors, including the type of stressor, the history of both stress and alcohol exposure, genetic background, sex, and ethanol preference phenotype (Bond, 1978; Chester et al., 2004, 2006; van der Kam et al., 2005; Lynch et al., 1999; Rockman and Glavin, 1986; Rockman et al., 1986; Vengeliene et al., 2003; Volpicelli et al., 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, an extensive body of research has linked both physical and psychosocial stressors to alcohol consumption in humans and experimental animals (Pohorecky, 1981, 1990, 1991; Sillaber and Henniger, 2004). This research area is rather complex, however, as stress has been reported to either increase or decrease voluntary ethanol intake, depending on numerous situational and organismal factors, including the type of stressor, the history of both stress and alcohol exposure, genetic background, sex, and ethanol preference phenotype (Bond, 1978; Chester et al., 2004, 2006; van der Kam et al., 2005; Lynch et al., 1999; Rockman and Glavin, 1986; Rockman et al., 1986; Vengeliene et al., 2003; Volpicelli et al., 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%