“…Reviews and meta-analyses typically face some limitations, such as a small number of studies (Biddle et al, 2019 ; Schuch et al, 2019 ; Andermo et al, 2020 ; Lambez et al, 2020 ; Carter et al, 2021 ; Liang et al, 2021 ), differences in methodologies (Lambez et al, 2020 ; Vysniauske et al, 2020 ; Dhir et al, 2021 ; Seiffer et al, 2021 ), differences between studies in assessing PA and mental health outcomes (Biddle et al, 2019 ; Andermo et al, 2020 ; Liang et al, 2021 ; Ruhland and Lange, 2021 ; Welsch et al, 2021 ), studies with low or moderate quality and high risk of bias (Rodriguez-Ayllon et al, 2019 ; Vysniauske et al, 2020 ; Carter et al, 2021 ; Dhir et al, 2021 ; Seiffer et al, 2021 ; Welsch et al, 2021 ), and non-representative samples (Biddle et al, 2019 ; Rodriguez-Ayllon et al, 2019 ; Vysniauske et al, 2020 ; Bourke et al, 2021 ; Liang et al, 2021 ; Welsch et al, 2021 ). Individual studies have small and non-representative samples (Ahn et al, 2018 ; Bowe et al, 2021 ; Mercurio et al, 2021 ), low quality, no long-term follow-ups, and inadequate consideration of real-world implementation factors for intervention studies (Parker et al, 2019 ).…”