The efficacy of synthetic allograft and bioresorbable xenograft in immediate implant procedures: A comparative clinical study

Objectives: The objective is to compare demineralized freeze-dried bone and modified hydroxyapatite granules in patients requiring immediate dental implants. Materials and Methods: Forty patients for immediate dental implants were divided into Group I (demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft) and Group II (modified hydroxyapatite) based on the type of graft used. Success of graft was evaluated based on modified plaque index, gingival index, and Periotest at 3, 6, and 12 months follow up. Results: The mean modified plaque index, gingival index, peri-implant sulcular depth, and Periotest were recorded at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months at implant site and full mouth in both groups found to be nonsignificant ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft and modified hydroxyapatite grafts were equally efficient in immediate dental implant placement sites.

show abstract

Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone and Modified Hydroxyapatite Granules in Patients Requiring Immediate Dental Implants

Pragna

Bulkar

Reddy

et al. 2022

Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Assessment of Biograft-HT with I-PRF Graft in Immediate Dental Implant Placement

Baghel,

Sahoo,

Sharma

et al. 2023

Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This research was done to assess the efficacy of I-PRF and bone graft in immediate dental implant placement. Materials and Method: Twenty patients were selected randomly into 2 groups with 10 samples in each as Group I- using I-PRF and Group II with synthetic bone replacement alloplast (biograft-HT) after immediate implant placement. Postoperative clinical assessment after graft placement was done based on visual analog scale for pain, modified gingival index and modified plaque index at 2nd, 4th, and 6th months. A radiographic assessment of bone density was performed two and six months after the placement of the implant. Result: There was a statistically considerable variation between the change in modified plaque index and modified gingival index. There was a statistically insignificant divergence in the mean visual analog scale between the two groups at 1, 3, and 6 days. Group I demonstrated a higher change in bone density than group II, with a statistically significant difference (P = .002). Conclusion: An innovative, safe, and efficient method for controlling the healing process around immediate dental implants is provided by the use of I-PRF in conjunction with immediate dental implant placement.

show abstract

A Comparison of Xenograft Graft Material and Synthetic Bioactive Glass Allograft in Immediate Dental Implant Patients

Goutam

Batra

Jyothirmayee

et al. 2022

Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: The objective of the study is to compare xenograft graft material and synthetic bioactive glass allograft in immediate dental implant patients. Materials and Methods: Forty patients were grouped as Group A patients (xenograft graft material, BioOss) and Group B (synthetic allograft material, Perio Glas) and immediate implant placement was done. Plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, and bone resorption were compared at different intervals. Results: A nonsignificant difference was observed in all parameters at different interval of time ( P > 0.05) recorded at mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual side. Conclusion: Xenograft (Bio Oss) and synthetic allograft (PerioGlas) found to be effective graft materials treatment choice.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

The efficacy of synthetic allograft and bioresorbable xenograft in immediate implant procedures: A comparative clinical study

Cited by 4 publications

References 1 publication

Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone and Modified Hydroxyapatite Granules in Patients Requiring Immediate Dental Implants

Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone and Modified Hydroxyapatite Granules in Patients Requiring Immediate Dental Implants

Assessment of Biograft-HT with I-PRF Graft in Immediate Dental Implant Placement

A Comparison of Xenograft Graft Material and Synthetic Bioactive Glass Allograft in Immediate Dental Implant Patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About