We discuss a variational model, given by a weighted sum of perimeter, bending and Riesz interaction energies, that could be considered as a toy model for charged elastic drops. The different contributions have competing preferences for strongly localized and maximally dispersed structures. We investigate the energy landscape in dependence of the size of the 'charge', i.e. the weight of the Riesz interaction energy.In the two-dimensional case we first prove that for simply connected sets of small elastica energy, the elastica deficit controls the isoperimetric deficit. Building on this result, we show that for small charge the only minimizers of the full variational model are either balls or centered annuli. We complement these statements by a non-existence result for large charge. In three dimensions, we prove area and diameter bounds for configurations with small Willmore energy and show that balls are the unique minimizers of our variational model for sufficiently small charge. 1 We choose to keep the factor 1 4 in dimension three to stick with the traditional notation.F λ,Q (E).(1.3)We start by considering the planar problem d = 2 and first focus on the uncharged case Q = 0. For λ = 0 no global minimizer exists in M(|B 1 |), but it has been recently shown in [7,14] that balls minimize the elastica energy under volume constraint in the class of simply connected sets. Our first result is a quantitative version of this fact in the spirit of the quantitative isoperimetric inequality [18,10].Theorem 1.1. There exists a universal constant c 0 > 0 such that for every set E ∈ M sc (|B 1 |),where E∆F denotes the symmetric difference of the sets E and F . Furthermore, there exist δ 0 > 0 and c 1 > 0 such that if W (E) ≤ W (B 1 ) + δ 0 , then W (E) − W (B 1 ) ≥ c 1 (P (E) − P (B 1 )).