1981
DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(81)90266-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electret effect in polar molecule condensates in the temperature range 90–230 K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon was first reported in 1969, 1 yet it is far from common knowledge even today. Over the decades, few studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] had tried to quantify and explain the phenomenon. In recent years, interest has grown and several publications [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] have attempted to provide a mechanism for the generation of this astonishing result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phenomenon was first reported in 1969, 1 yet it is far from common knowledge even today. Over the decades, few studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] had tried to quantify and explain the phenomenon. In recent years, interest has grown and several publications [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] have attempted to provide a mechanism for the generation of this astonishing result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon has been studied more extensively for water. [1][2][3]5,7,8,10,12,19 The consensus is that measured voltages of fixed sign scale with the amount of material deposited and are substrate independent. It is also understood that substrate temperature affects the voltage created, with the general trend being that the lower the temperature, the higher the voltage established, although deviations from this trend were known from very early 2 on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously confirmed the presence of such intrinsic negative potential on ASW films deposited between 15 and 80 K from the reduced kinetic energies of sputtered secondary ions, 4 using a secondary ion mass spectrometer. While measurements of spontaneous polarization in amorphous ice have been reported for decades, 5,6 a recent study using low-energy electrons incident on ASW remarkably failed to detect polarization in water ice, 7 though it was observed in other condensed polar molecules using the same technique. 8 Together with small changes in polarization upon crystallization to the cubic phase (>130 K), 2,3,9 the most salient observations pertain to the decrease of the |V s | with increasing a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown by Kutzner (1972) and by Chrzanowski and Sujak (1981) that the value, as well as, the sign of the cryocondensate surface charge depends on the condensation temperature and the kind of molecules only. They observed periodic changes of the surface charge with condensation temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The main reason for the surface potential (surface charge) generation at the condensate layer is the ordering of the orientation of polar molecules during condensation (Kutzner, 1972;Chrzanowski and Sujak, 1981;Onsager et ul., 1978). The orientation of polar molecules could be induced by resonance interaction between molecules and the substrate phonons (Kutzner, 1972) or between molecules and the electromagnetic radiation from the substrate (Chrzanowski and Sujak, 1981) or induced by asymmetric electric field lines .around a condensing molecule (Onsager et ul., 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%