2007
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The English Lexicon Project

Abstract: One could easily argue that the most commonly studied stimulus set in experimental psychology involves English words. The study of the memory and reading of words has been central to research since Cattell (1886). Words are well-described units that provide the link between perception and meaning, and so have been critical to developments in computational modeling (e.g., McClelland & Rumelhart, 1981), neuroimaging (e.g., Petersen, Fox, Posner, Mintun, & Raichle, 1989, and conceptions of attention and automat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

23
2,235
2
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,327 publications
(2,337 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
23
2,235
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The target answers were submitted to the English Lexicon Project Web Site (Balota et al, 2007) to determine their word frequency indices. The majority (71/80) of the target answers' HAL frequency indices were available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target answers were submitted to the English Lexicon Project Web Site (Balota et al, 2007) to determine their word frequency indices. The majority (71/80) of the target answers' HAL frequency indices were available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to ensure that this was not the case we obtained various norms from the SUBTLEX corpus (Brysbaert & New, 2009) which is part of the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al, 2007). We conducted a paired ttest of the preview log frequency per million between the transposition (n+1 mean = 2.75, n+2 mean = 2.71) and substitution conditions (n+1 mean = 2.89, n+2 mean = 3.23).…”
Section: Materials and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Half of each subset consisted of high bigram frequency items (high-BF, ranging between 2200 -6900, mean 3387; mean for words 3917; mean for non-words 2859) and half of low bigram frequency items (low-BF, ranging between 1 -2000, mean 1270; mean for words 1493; mean for non-words 1047; Balota et al, 2007). BF by position "is based on the bigram frequencies that are sensitive to position within words.…”
Section: Stimuli and Procedurementioning
confidence: 99%