1989
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.20.4.229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ethical reasoning process in an organizational consulting situation.

Abstract: We focused on scenarios in which ethical considerations could aifect an organizational consultant's decision whether to provide services. 5 factors were systematically varied in the basic scenario: deception, coercion, risk, invasion of privacy, and probability of success. Ss were 19 faculty and doctoral students. In policy-capturing analysis of the ethical reasoning process, we found moderate agreement on whether to work on the hypothetical project but considerable individual differences in the reasons behind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found inspiration for the concept we selected for our flexible integrative approach to consultation, Situational Consultation. Tannenbaum, Greene, and Glickman (1989) proposed the term Situational Management for the fixed preference of specific managerial styles depending on the field, the trade, the organization, and its context. Hersey and Blanchard (1993) took this a step further by recommending a more dynamic formulation of Situational Leadership.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also found inspiration for the concept we selected for our flexible integrative approach to consultation, Situational Consultation. Tannenbaum, Greene, and Glickman (1989) proposed the term Situational Management for the fixed preference of specific managerial styles depending on the field, the trade, the organization, and its context. Hersey and Blanchard (1993) took this a step further by recommending a more dynamic formulation of Situational Leadership.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on human judgment of options rather than using models of "correct" decision making, acknowledges the great amount of nonratlonal and idiosyncratic processes that mark human decision making (York, 1989). PCT has been used to study a number of human judgment situations including the decisions of arbitrators in wage cases (Bazerman, 1985), individual preferences of students for occupational environments (Kluth & Muchinsky, 1984), the evaluations of EEOC experts about possible sexual harassment (York, 1989), investment strategies (Slovic, 1969), and the ethical reasoning of organizational consultants (Tannenbaum, Greene, & Glickman, 1989).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%