1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.1999.00579.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evaluation of Depression in Inpatients with HIV Disease

Abstract: The aetiological approach used by clinicians familiar with the features of HIV disease, was found to be useful. All four rating scales differentiated equally well between depressed and non-depressed groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Svanborg and Aberg 4 the BDI is the most often used self-rating instrument for depressive symptoms and when compared with a self-rating version of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S), was found to be equivalent. Similar findings were found by Kalichman et al 5 and Cockram et al 6 when comparing with other rating scales.…”
Section: Inventory (Bdi)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…According to Svanborg and Aberg 4 the BDI is the most often used self-rating instrument for depressive symptoms and when compared with a self-rating version of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S), was found to be equivalent. Similar findings were found by Kalichman et al 5 and Cockram et al 6 when comparing with other rating scales.…”
Section: Inventory (Bdi)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Scores ≥16 on the CESD suggest a diagnosis of dysthymia or major depression [33]. The CESD primarily taps cognitive-affective aspects of depression and has been shown to be useful in chronically ill groups experiencing fatigue (e.g., HIV, cancer), including OSA patients [34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Psychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical limitations resulting from the HIV disease process have been associated with depression and have predicted the incidence of depression in HIV-infected men (Griffin, Rabkin, Remien, & Williams, 1998). The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Rating Scale were capable of differentially diagnosing depression in men who were depressed and non-depressed (Cockram, Judd, Mijch, & Norman, 1999). Therefore, these tools are capable of assisting the clinician with the diagnostic differential of depression in HIV-infected men.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%