2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11049-020-09488-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘experiential’ as an existential past

Abstract: Recent literature has debated the nature and robustness of distinctions between pronominal tenses and existential tenses, between absolute tenses and relative tenses, and between perfect aspects and relative tenses. In this paper, we investigate anteriority markers in Javanese and Atayal, two distantly related Austronesian languages. On the basis of a range of empirical diagnostics, we propose that the markers tau in Javanese and-in-in Atayal are relative past tenses with existential semantics. We demonstrate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 78 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But if what is interpreted is the set of features from which the syntactic representation is composed-the same features that are ultimately interpreted-then a semantic analysis of tense must grapple seriously with the possibility that the interpretation of tense may vary considerably across languages, either in the organization of features that encode tense, or in the precise interpretation of those features. Ogihara and Sharvit (2012), for example, have proposed that languages may vary in terms of whether they exhibit pronominal or quantificational tense, while Chen et al (2020) have argued further that a single language may exhibit both pronominal and quantificational tenses. Pancheva and Zubizarreta (2020) argue that some morphologically tenseless languages, specifically Paraguayan Guaraní, are entirely semantically tenseless, with the temporal interpretation of a clause arising entirely from viewpoint aspect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But if what is interpreted is the set of features from which the syntactic representation is composed-the same features that are ultimately interpreted-then a semantic analysis of tense must grapple seriously with the possibility that the interpretation of tense may vary considerably across languages, either in the organization of features that encode tense, or in the precise interpretation of those features. Ogihara and Sharvit (2012), for example, have proposed that languages may vary in terms of whether they exhibit pronominal or quantificational tense, while Chen et al (2020) have argued further that a single language may exhibit both pronominal and quantificational tenses. Pancheva and Zubizarreta (2020) argue that some morphologically tenseless languages, specifically Paraguayan Guaraní, are entirely semantically tenseless, with the temporal interpretation of a clause arising entirely from viewpoint aspect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%