2016
DOI: 10.1037/xge0000149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The extreme relativity of perception: A new contextual effect modulates human resolving power.

Abstract: The authors report the discovery of a new effect of context that modulates human resolving power with respect to an individual stimulus. They show that the size of the difference threshold or the just noticeable difference around a standard stimulus depends on the range of the other standards tested simultaneously for resolution within the same experimental session. The larger this range, the poorer the resolving power for a given standard. The authors term this effect the range of standards effect (RSE). They… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of a difference between Part‐word and Non‐word ratings in Experiment 1 is also not predicted by either model. Here, we suggest that the presence of the highly unfamiliar Reduplication condition played a role in reducing the dynamic range for other responses (Namdar, Ganel, & Algom, ). It is possible that if the Reduplication condition had not been present, a significant difference between Part‐words and Non‐words might have been observed, as in Experiment 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The lack of a difference between Part‐word and Non‐word ratings in Experiment 1 is also not predicted by either model. Here, we suggest that the presence of the highly unfamiliar Reduplication condition played a role in reducing the dynamic range for other responses (Namdar, Ganel, & Algom, ). It is possible that if the Reduplication condition had not been present, a significant difference between Part‐words and Non‐words might have been observed, as in Experiment 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The results showed that stimulus resolution was affected by context range. When the stimulus was presented in a wide context range, resolution went in the same direction of the context range and JNDs were larger compared to the narrow-range condition (Namdar et al, 2016). These results were replicated and extended in a follow-up study that compared the effect of stimulus range between perception and action .…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The results of Experiment 1 suggest that 2D grasping is subjected to effects of context. In a similar way to perceptual estimations (Namdar et al, 2016, resolution was modulated by the range of the other stimuli presented in the block. This pattern of results suggests that the visuomotor system, which in other cases was found to be immune to task-irrelevant contextual information, is intruded by this information when 2D objects are presented for grasp.…”
Section: Grip Aperturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations