1986
DOI: 10.1002/art.1780290714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The face scale: A brief, nonverbal method for assessing patient mood

Abstract: Validity and reliability studies were conducted on the Face Scale, a very brief, pictorial scale of mood which uses a sequence of 20 faces and does not require reading literacy. Correlational and experimental evidence of the Face Scale's construct validity is presented, as well as its test-retest reliability. Recommendations are made for its use as a screening tool and for additional validity studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the self-rated health status, a method that employed face-scale scores was used (8). Based on the score of the answers, the subjects were divided into three groups based on overall health (moderate, good, and very good).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the self-rated health status, a method that employed face-scale scores was used (8). Based on the score of the answers, the subjects were divided into three groups based on overall health (moderate, good, and very good).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subscale scores were the sum of the items in each domain. In addition to the 32-item scale, the Face Scale, prepared with some modification from the original form reported by Lorish and Maisiak, 10 contains five drawings of a single face arranged in decreasing order of mood and numbered from 1 to 5, with 1 representing the most positive mood and 5 representing the most negative mood.…”
Section: Qol Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a majority of the sample were university students (46%) and the sample size of young participants was low (n ¼ 17), more research would be needed to ensure usability for children and different educational levels. However, many existing studies on pictorial scales including the SAM scale could prove their usefulness for children (e.g., Dubi & Schneider, 2009;Muris et al, 2001;Pianosi, Smith, Almudevar, & McGrath, 2006;Robertson et al, 2006;Valla et al, 1994), different educational levels and adult non-readers (e.g., Lang, 1985;Lorish & Maisiak, 2005;Maldonado et al, 2004). The same accounts for the possible use for different cultures: Existing literature (e.g., Bradley & Lang, 1994) suggests that pictorial scales bear great potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example is the face scale, a nonverbal instrument for assessing the actual mood (Lorish & Maisiak, 2005).…”
Section: Visual Scales As a Possible Substitute For Verbal Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%