2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00104-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fatigue strength of compact bone in torsion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some investigators 28,34,35 choose a percentage of stiffness loss as the criterion for failure. We initially selected 15% loss of stiffness as the failure criterion, a likely range for significant microcrack accumulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigators 28,34,35 choose a percentage of stiffness loss as the criterion for failure. We initially selected 15% loss of stiffness as the failure criterion, a likely range for significant microcrack accumulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 The Iosipescu method allows for testing the in-plane shear properties in a homogeneous and uniform deformation mode, which can not be achieved by the more usually employed torsion test methods. 23 All specimens were sanded and polished by using carbide papers (grade 800-1200 grit) and then polished to a mirror finish by the use of alumina slurry paste (MetPrep, Coventry, UK, gamma alumina 0.05 lm). Sample preparation was performed under constant water irrigation, to prevent the production of microcracks or damage to the specimen prior to mechanical testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What further complicates the matter is that once the elementary constituents mineral and collagen have failed, a complex series of crack propagation events starts, spanning length scales between tens of nanometers and ultimately several millimeters. Related toughening strategies in bone have been intensively studied [Burr et al, 1998, Reilly and Currey, 2000, Akkus and Rimnac, 2001, Okumura and Gennes, 2001, Taylor et al, 2003, Ballarini et al, 2005, O'Brien et al, 2007, Koester et al, 2008, but a consistent mathematical theory for relating them to the overall, tissuespecific bone strength seems to be an enormously difficult task. Given this highly challenging situation, we ask: Can continuum micromechanics help to explain not only bone elasticity, but also bone strength from the material's internal structure and composition?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%