2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-018-0852-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The first Illumina-based de novo transcriptome analysis and molecular marker development in Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
1
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a total of 178, 330 of the 196,124 unigenes (90.93%) in the RT sample and 129,746 of the 140,766 unigenes (92.17%) in the CT sample were annotated to public databases (Nr, Nt, Swis-sProt, GO, KOG and KEGG) for comprehensive analysis Table S3). Compared with previous studies in plants of the genus Pennisetum, which reported 103,454 annotated unigenes from 197,466 unigenes [27], the present study obtained more complete annotation information.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Moreover, a total of 178, 330 of the 196,124 unigenes (90.93%) in the RT sample and 129,746 of the 140,766 unigenes (92.17%) in the CT sample were annotated to public databases (Nr, Nt, Swis-sProt, GO, KOG and KEGG) for comprehensive analysis Table S3). Compared with previous studies in plants of the genus Pennisetum, which reported 103,454 annotated unigenes from 197,466 unigenes [27], the present study obtained more complete annotation information.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Moreover, a total of 178,330 of the 196,124 unigenes (90.93%) in the RT sample and 129,746 of the 140,766 unigenes (92.17%) in the CT sample were annotated to public databases (Nr, Nt, SwissProt, GO, KOG and KEGG) for comprehensive analysis (Supplementary Table 3). Compared with previous studies in plants of the genus Pennisetum, which reported 103,454 annotated unigenes from 197,466 unigenes [27], the present study obtained more complete annotation information.…”
Section: Giganteumcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The DArTseq sequence reads corresponding to the SNP and SilicoDArT markers were aligned to Napier grass genomic [30] and transcriptome [31] sequences using the bwa mem sequence alignment method [32], and the sequences were annotated using the GeneBank NCBI blastx tool (https://blast. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).…”
Section: Marker-trait Association Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nucleotide sequences of the associated markers were retrieved from the available Napier grass genomic [30] and transcriptomic [31] sequence data by aligning the DArTseq short sequence reads (approximately 55 nucleotides (nt)) corresponding to each SilicoDArT marker ( Supplementary Table S1). Seven of the SilicoDArT markers were aligned with the assembled genomic sequences [30].…”
Section: Analysis Of Nucleotide Sequences Corresponding To the Associmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation