1992
DOI: 10.1038/359207a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The formation of binary and multiple star systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
2
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
45
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A mechanism which drives mass ratios towards unity in simulations of star formation was first described by Chapman et al (1992), and has subsequently been noted by Burkert & Bodenheimer (1993) and by Bate & Bonnell (1997) (but see Ochi et al 2005 for a different view, and Clarke 2007, for a rebuttal of Ochi et al). If a binary system continues to grow by accretion, the specific angular momentum of the infalling material (relative to the centre of mass of the binary system) tends to increase with time.…”
Section: Multiplicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mechanism which drives mass ratios towards unity in simulations of star formation was first described by Chapman et al (1992), and has subsequently been noted by Burkert & Bodenheimer (1993) and by Bate & Bonnell (1997) (but see Ochi et al 2005 for a different view, and Clarke 2007, for a rebuttal of Ochi et al). If a binary system continues to grow by accretion, the specific angular momentum of the infalling material (relative to the centre of mass of the binary system) tends to increase with time.…”
Section: Multiplicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to evaluate the contribution that collisions make to the overall galactic star formation rate, as we do not know how frequently such collisions occur, nor how star formation proceeds when they do (e.g Pongracic et al 1992;Chapman et al 1992;Whitworth et al 1994;Heitsch et al 2006;Inoue & Fukui 2013;Dobbs, Pringle & Duarte-Cabral 2015). Moreover, instances where on-going star formation may have been triggered by cloud-cloud collisions are hard to identify, and the observations are difficult to interpret unambiguously (Haworth et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If star formation is dynamically-triggered, then the stars formed will be much more tightly clustered than is the average across the whole of the star-forming region. For instance, in simulations of star formation triggered by clump-clump collisions in a GMC (Chapman et al 1992, the majority of the stars that are formed undergo encounters. The star formation in such events is coeval, however, so that the initial encounters that occur are likely to be disc-disc rather than disc-star interactions.…”
Section: Capture Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%