The Fossils of Atapuerca: Scientific Nationalism and the New Beginning of Spanish History

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown how closely nation‐building accompanies research into human prehistory. While these studies primarily focus on the period before 1945, the example of the Spanish site Atapuerca demonstrates that the strong link between hominid fossils and national identity still exists in the twenty‐first century. The article argues that there are different ways of appropriating prehistoric human remains. One may distinguish the concept of ‘biological continuity’ in which the fossils represent some kind of ancestor from the concept of ‘scientific nationalism’. The latter consists in the pride in the scholarly achievement and international recognition of ‘our own’ scientists. The Atapuerca project was crucial in overcoming the Spanish ‘inferiority complex’ with respect to scientific prowess. In Atapuerca we may even discern a third concept: the marketing of origins in order to lure tourists to the site – nationalism enterprised‐up. The Spanish researchers created a multifold ‘popularization industry’ and forged a close alliance with the national media. Thus, this article will try to explain how Atapuerca turned within less than ten years from a little known archaeological site to the – however imaginary – starting point of Spanish history at the turn of the millennium.

Scuffles, Scoops and Scams: The Construction of Prehistoric Knowledge in Newspapers

“…A recurring and by now classical theme in the historiography of prehistory is the nationalist appropriation of hominid fossils, stone tools or rock art (Schlanger, ; Schmalzer, ; Lanzarote, ; Manias, ). These contributions show how investigations were intertwined with efforts to create a national identity, an ‘ethnic past’ that goes way back in time (‘biological continuity’), but also how the pride in the achievements of ‘one's own’ researchers was kindled (‘scientific nationalism’) (Hochadel, ). As this special issue intends to show there are more variants to this theme.…”

Spain's magic mountain: narrating prehistory at Atapuerca

“…The nationalist appropriation can, however, be seen in the histories of their own project, a 'scientific' rather than a 'biological' nationalism. 12 The researchers are emphatic: the EIA is a Spanish team, and part of the recent democratic history, beginning as it did in the year (1978) when the new Spanish Constitution was drafted. 13 The three co-directors neatly represent the whole of Spain, including the two regions historically well known for striving for more autonomy or even independence: Carbonell is Catalan, Bermúdez de Castro is from Madrid and Arsuaga's family is from the Basque country.…”