2004
DOI: 10.2307/20033982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Four Faces of Nuclear Terror: And the Need for a Prioritized Response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such facilities, which may be near the site of waste generation or in distal locations, often were not originally designed for the purpose of LLRW storage, particularly with regard to security. Facility security has become particularly important in light of the domestic terrorist acts of 2001, wherein sources of radioactivity became recognized commodities to those wishing to create disruption through the purposeful dissemination of radioactive materials (Stone 2002;Palmore 2003;Potter et al 2004). Employing a risk-based approach, regulatory officials have necessarily focused security control attention on a designated set of specific high activity radionuclides, which are considered to represent the greatest risk for use in a radiological dispersal device (RDD).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such facilities, which may be near the site of waste generation or in distal locations, often were not originally designed for the purpose of LLRW storage, particularly with regard to security. Facility security has become particularly important in light of the domestic terrorist acts of 2001, wherein sources of radioactivity became recognized commodities to those wishing to create disruption through the purposeful dissemination of radioactive materials (Stone 2002;Palmore 2003;Potter et al 2004). Employing a risk-based approach, regulatory officials have necessarily focused security control attention on a designated set of specific high activity radionuclides, which are considered to represent the greatest risk for use in a radiological dispersal device (RDD).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%