2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2017.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Frölicher-type inequalities of foliations

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that if the basic ̄lemma holds for a foliated manifold (M, F) , then it also holds for appropriately small deformations of the transverse holomorphic structure (provided that we do not deform the foliation itself) as well as a similar rigidity theorem for being transversely Kähler. These results aside from the upper semi-continuity theorem for the Bott-Chern and Aeppli cohomology use the Frölicher-type inequality for foliations which was proven in [19]. In Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We show that if the basic ̄lemma holds for a foliated manifold (M, F) , then it also holds for appropriately small deformations of the transverse holomorphic structure (provided that we do not deform the foliation itself) as well as a similar rigidity theorem for being transversely Kähler. These results aside from the upper semi-continuity theorem for the Bott-Chern and Aeppli cohomology use the Frölicher-type inequality for foliations which was proven in [19]. In Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this subsection we provide some of the results from [19] which will be used in this paper. Let M be a manifold of dimension n = p + 2q , endowed with a Hermitian foliation F of complex codimension q.…”
Section: Basic Bott-chern and Aeppli Cohomology Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cohomologies (and especially their non-foliated counterparts) are subject of extensive studies (cf. [2][3][4]9,12,14]); in particular, it can be proved (cf. [12]) that for Riemannian foliations they are all finite dimensional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…[2][3][4]9,12,14]); in particular, it can be proved (cf. [12]) that for Riemannian foliations they are all finite dimensional. Our examples amount to say that certain compactness conditions in those proofs cannot be dropped, which is by no means obvious (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation