2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
57
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
10
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased activity observed in precuneus during focal PM trials supports the idea that the episodic retrieval processes engaged during these trials may be spontaneous, that is, occurring in the absence of sustained aPFC activation (see also Beck, Ruge, Walser, & Goschke, 2012). Although we do not have a strong interpretation regarding the connectivity pattern observed between right middle temporal gyrus and aPFC during focal PM, we speculate that it may reflect a bottom-up retrieval process initiated by the temporal cortex, that may enable the suspension of on-going processing, shifting focus towards the retrieval-related significance of the cue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The increased activity observed in precuneus during focal PM trials supports the idea that the episodic retrieval processes engaged during these trials may be spontaneous, that is, occurring in the absence of sustained aPFC activation (see also Beck, Ruge, Walser, & Goschke, 2012). Although we do not have a strong interpretation regarding the connectivity pattern observed between right middle temporal gyrus and aPFC during focal PM, we speculate that it may reflect a bottom-up retrieval process initiated by the temporal cortex, that may enable the suspension of on-going processing, shifting focus towards the retrieval-related significance of the cue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…These findings complement and extend prior work that has leveraged fMRI data to dissociate PM strategies using activity from a distributed network of brain regions. For example, work by McDaniel et al (McDaniel et al, 2013) showed that activity in frontoparietal control networks was greater in conditions that require greater levels of strategic monitoring (e.g., non-focal vs. focal PM targets; for other relevant data, see Reynolds et al, 2009; Burgess et al, 2011; McDaniel et al, 2013; Barban et al, 2014; Beck et al, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theories of PM (Cohen and O’Reilly, 1996; Gollwitzer and Brandstätter, 1997; McDaniel and Einstein, 2000) posit that two strategies can be used: Participants can use working memory (WM) to actively monitor the environment for an appropriate time or event (Koechlin and Hyafil, 2007; Gilbert, 2011) or they can store the intention in episodic memory (EM) and hope that it is automatically retrieved when the time comes to act on that intention (McDaniel and Einstein, 2007b; Beck et al, 2014; for related ideas about dual systems involved in PM and control see Cohen and O’Reilly, 1996 and Braver, 2012). PM is typically studied using a dual-task paradigm in which a PM task is embedded in another cognitive task that requires vigilance and frequent behavioral decisions (the “ongoing task”).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies highlighted the involvement of the rostral prefrontal cortex (RPFC), whose lateral part is activated, contrasting with the deactivation of the medial part (Burgess et al 2001;Burgess et al 2003;den Ouden et al 2005;Simons et al 2006;Rusted et al 2011;Benoit et al 2012;Barban et al 2013;Beck et al 2014; see Burgess et al 2011;Cona et al 2015 for reviews). According to the Gateway Hypothesis , the deactivation of the medial part of the RPFC and the activation of its lateral part reflect the shift of attentional focus from external stimulation (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%