2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The gender gap in same-gender voting: The role of context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Less than one-fifth (19.8%) voted for a woman and about a quarter (27.5%) voted for a list. Similar to findings from Finland (Giger et al 2014), male voters were thus far more likely than women to engage in same-sex voting: about one-quarter of female voters cast preferential votes in favor of female candidates, while more than half of male voters voted preferentially for male candidates. The vast majority of women in the electorate thus did not use this option to advance female candidates, although they did so to a greater extent than did men, the majority of who supported male candidates over other possibilities.…”
Section: Exploring Voter Motivationssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Less than one-fifth (19.8%) voted for a woman and about a quarter (27.5%) voted for a list. Similar to findings from Finland (Giger et al 2014), male voters were thus far more likely than women to engage in same-sex voting: about one-quarter of female voters cast preferential votes in favor of female candidates, while more than half of male voters voted preferentially for male candidates. The vast majority of women in the electorate thus did not use this option to advance female candidates, although they did so to a greater extent than did men, the majority of who supported male candidates over other possibilities.…”
Section: Exploring Voter Motivationssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…A study of the 2009 parliamentary elections in Indonesia suggests that the presence of female incumbents in political office may lead to a reduction in gender bias on the part of both elites and voters (Shair-Rosenfield 2012). Data from Finnish elections over time indicates, similarly, that as there are more equal numbers of men and women as candidates and elected officials, both male and female voters become more willing to vote for women (Giger et al 2014). Without data from other points in time, it is difficult for us to test this theoryalthough it may help explain the relatively high share of women as both candidates and elected councilors in Denmark.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have a stronger sense of identity and more to win by getting represented. Erzeel and Caluwaerts (2015), Holli and Wass (2010), and Giger et al (2014) have the same expectation, but surprisingly find the opposite, demonstrating that men are more likely to vote on the basis of gender than women. This finding could be explained by the design they use.…”
Section: Gender Age and Locationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Previous studies have indicated gender differences in the political behaviour of the electorate. Gender differences in party choice and voting are found both in presidential-style systems such as the United States and in parliamentarian systems allowing the electorate to vote for a specific candidate (Zipp & Plutzer 1985;Huddy & Terkildsen 1993a;Plutzer & Zipp 1996;Sanbonmatsu 2002;Holli & Wass 2010;Giger et al 2014). Gender gaps in voting patterns might result from differences in ideological positions and policy opinions (see, e.g., Togeby 1994;Studlar et al 1998;Inglehart & Norris 2000), perception of sex roles (Hershey 1977(Hershey , 1980, as well as gender identity and gender stereotyping focused upon here.…”
Section: Gender and Party Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%