Diagnosing women's under-representation in electoral politics often involves a "blame game," seeking to identify the primary factor responsible for depressing the share of women among candidates as well as elected officials. The Danish electoral systemin which parties present ordered lists of candidates but voters have the option to cast preference votes that can rearrange the list orderprovides an opportunity to assess the relative role of elite versus voter bias in shaping women's electoral fortunes. Using data from local elections in 2009, we find greater evidence for elite bias against women. We also observe, however, that voters do not widely exploit their preference votes. In an original post-election survey, we discover that "candidate gender" is less important for male and female voters than a host of other characteristics when deciding for which candidate to cast a preference vote. The blame game: analyzing gender bias in Danish local elections Women have made major gains in political representation around the world in recent decades, but still constitute a minority of elected officials (Inter-Parliamentary Union 2018). As put in the introduction to this Dialogue, women are 'still not there.' Although some scholars argue that women's under-representation is due to a low supply of women coming forward (Lawless and Fox 2005), a growing consensus in research points to weak demand for female candidates (Krook 2010). On the demand side, however, the relative role of elite versus voter bias in shaping women's electoral fortunes continues to be debated, generating a 'blame game' attributing women's under