2001
DOI: 10.2520/myco.51.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The German ochratoxin A project: Contamination of foods and consumer exposure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Spain, in Italy, and in France (Aquitaine area), the maximum values were 4 lg/L, 2 lg/L and 161 lg/L, respectively (Jimenez et al, 1998;Creppy et al, 1993). The German population presents a median concentration of 0.2 lg/L (Gareis et al, 2001). Higher maximum levels have also been reported in other European countries, such as Croatia, Denmark, and Poland (Peraica et al, 1999;Jimenez et al, 1998) (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Spain, in Italy, and in France (Aquitaine area), the maximum values were 4 lg/L, 2 lg/L and 161 lg/L, respectively (Jimenez et al, 1998;Creppy et al, 1993). The German population presents a median concentration of 0.2 lg/L (Gareis et al, 2001). Higher maximum levels have also been reported in other European countries, such as Croatia, Denmark, and Poland (Peraica et al, 1999;Jimenez et al, 1998) (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The frequency of detection of 100% was also observed in Sweden-Visby, Switzerland, Norway-Oslo, and Canada. However, other countries, such Yugoslavia, Germany, Croatia, and Tunisia showed detections oscillating between 6.6% and 98% (Marquardt and Frolich, 1992;Gareis et al, 2001;Peraica et al, 1999;Singare-Tigori et al, 2006), probably due to different limits of detection or limits of quantification of the analytical methodology used. Data disposable from bibliography shows that LODs vary between 0.01 lg/L and 0.52 lg/L and LOQs between 0.05 lg/L and 0.78 lg/L (Thuvander et al, 2001;Jimenez et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, evidences in renal-specific toxicity, epigenetic and genotoxic mechanisms have been reported [8]. OTA has been detected in food and feeds including meat and meat products [9][10][11][12]. Its occurrence in meat and meat products can be ascribed to an indirect transmission via the ingestion of OTA-contaminated feed by pigs [13,14] or to direct contamination due to mould growth in the outer layers of meat products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cereal products are assumed to be the major dietary source in humans [5], although other commodities (pork meat, coffee, wine, beer, cheese, poultry products) can contain traces of this toxin [6,7,8,9]. OTA can occur in animal products as a result of either direct contamination with toxigenic moulds or indirect transmission (carryover) in animals fed with naturally contaminated feed [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%