2007
DOI: 10.1080/14781150701358995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Global Political Discourse of Dialogue among Civilizations: Mohammad Khatami and Václav Havel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Civilizational dialogue as discourse and debate is considered a good response to Fukuyama's notion of the "end of history" and Huntington's idea of a "clash of civilizations" [3]. Here, we want to highlight the beautiful reflection of the great Iranian leader Mohammad Khatami: "Every dialogue, based on a presumption of the worth of the 'Other' provides grounds for human creativity to flourish" [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Civilizational dialogue as discourse and debate is considered a good response to Fukuyama's notion of the "end of history" and Huntington's idea of a "clash of civilizations" [3]. Here, we want to highlight the beautiful reflection of the great Iranian leader Mohammad Khatami: "Every dialogue, based on a presumption of the worth of the 'Other' provides grounds for human creativity to flourish" [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This perspective draws from, and can be situated in, wider political and social theoretical debates. Whether communitarian and religious critiques of liberal secular universalist norms and projects (Dallmayr 2002;Dallmayr and Manoochehri 2007;De Bary 1998;Michael and Petito 2009;Petito 2007;Weiming 2000), sociological critiques of singular and homogenizing modernization paradigms (Berger and Huntington 2003;Eisenstadt 2003), conservative skepticism of liberal utopianism and hubris (Huntington 1996), or post-colonial and non-Western critiques of Western economic, political and cultural imperialism (Esposito and Voll 2000;Hobson 2007Hobson , 2004Tsygankov 2008).…”
Section: Three Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is further possible to point at the constructive role played, instead, by a wide range of normative proposals and initiatives for dialogue advanced by scholars and intellectuals, not simply as a reaction to Huntington, but as a legitimate autonomous alternative intellectual tradition of understanding world politics (Dallmayr 2002;Dallmayr and Manoochehri 2007;Esposito and Voll 2000;Forst and Ahmed 2005;Kayaoğlu 2012;Lynch 2000;Michael and Petito 2009;Petito 2011Petito , 2007. Here, the development of the UNAOC can be considered as "the latest phase in the evolving discussion of 'intercultural dialogue' at the UN-level" (Bloom 2013, 3), most prominently revitalized in the 1990s by former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami (1997Khatami ( , 2000Khatami, van Ess, and Küng 2001) and his proposal to designate 2001 as the year of the Dialog among Civilizations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si veda, inotre HAVEL, 1998. 15 Il problema interessa diverse discipline (GHEMAWAT, 2007;SEN, 2006;PETITO, 2007;INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION, 1996).…”
Section: Riferimenti Bibliograficiunclassified