2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-27821-4_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Greedy Algorithm for the Minimum Common String Partition Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Christie and Irving [4] prove that unsigned SBR is NP-hard for binary strings and Chen et al [3] show that 2-SBR is NP-hard. The best approximation ratio for the general signed SBR is O(log n log * n) (following from the work of Cormode and Muthukrishnan [6]); there are O(1)-approximation algorithms for signed 2-SBR and 3-SBR [3,5,9]. Kolman [11] describes a greedy-like O(k 2 )-approximation algorithm for k-SBR running in O(kn) time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Christie and Irving [4] prove that unsigned SBR is NP-hard for binary strings and Chen et al [3] show that 2-SBR is NP-hard. The best approximation ratio for the general signed SBR is O(log n log * n) (following from the work of Cormode and Muthukrishnan [6]); there are O(1)-approximation algorithms for signed 2-SBR and 3-SBR [3,5,9]. Kolman [11] describes a greedy-like O(k 2 )-approximation algorithm for k-SBR running in O(kn) time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional edit distance is then applied on the new strings. Chrobak et al [12] consider the Minimum Common String Partition (MCSP) problem, that receives two input strings and tries to minimize the number of partitions of the strings into the same collection of substrings. They refer to several versions of this problem by limiting the number of times each character can occur in both input strings, and study the approximation of a greedy algorithm for MCSP that at each step extracts a longest common substring from the given strings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardness results from above led to the development of approximation algorithms for move operations. The results include a greedy algorithm presented in Shapira and Storer (2002) which achieves an approximation factor of O(n 0.69 ) as shown by Chrobak et al (2005). Furthermore, Cormode and Muthukrishnan (2002) presented a O(log * n log n) factor approximation algorithm for general move operations which runs in sub-quadratic time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%