1940
DOI: 10.1002/ar.1090760211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The growth and pigmentary responses of eyeless amblystoma embryos reared in light and in darkness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1945
1945
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these results I conclude that not only is vision not being used in nocturnal feeding by these salamanders, but that vision may not be as important in die1 feeding as initially suspected (Nicholas 1922;Anderson 1968;Dodson and Dodson 197 1;Sprules 1972;Zaret 1980). This conclusion agrees with Ambystoma growth data collected by Detwiler and Copenhaver (1940) who observe, ". .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From these results I conclude that not only is vision not being used in nocturnal feeding by these salamanders, but that vision may not be as important in die1 feeding as initially suspected (Nicholas 1922;Anderson 1968;Dodson and Dodson 197 1;Sprules 1972;Zaret 1980). This conclusion agrees with Ambystoma growth data collected by Detwiler and Copenhaver (1940) who observe, ". .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results suggest that olfaction alone is not sufficient for the observed feeding rates and size selection in salamanders. Indeed, Detwiler and Copenhaver (1940) found that Ambystoma larvae deprived of both eyes and nasal placodes as embryos responded by snapping at food and inanimate objects in motion. They state (p. 243), "We wish to emphasize the fact that in the absence of both eyes and the nasal placodes the larvae feed as well as do normal animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%