2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The gustin (CA6) gene polymorphism, rs2274333 (A/G), is associated with fungiform papilla density, whereas PROP bitterness is mostly due to TAS2R38 in an ethnically-mixed population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
63
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Padiglia et al [27] found that polymorphisms in the CA6 gene influence the binding of gustin and zinc, thus impacting taste function. In addition, bitter taste sensitivity is inversely associated with fungiform papillae density [44,47], and gustin is a reported trophic factor involved in taste bud growth and development [33,48,49]. We found that homozygosity of the CA6 -rs227432 C allele was associated with increased risk of struggles with control during mealtimes, suggesting that gustin polymorphisms may play a role in children's picky eating behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Padiglia et al [27] found that polymorphisms in the CA6 gene influence the binding of gustin and zinc, thus impacting taste function. In addition, bitter taste sensitivity is inversely associated with fungiform papillae density [44,47], and gustin is a reported trophic factor involved in taste bud growth and development [33,48,49]. We found that homozygosity of the CA6 -rs227432 C allele was associated with increased risk of struggles with control during mealtimes, suggesting that gustin polymorphisms may play a role in children's picky eating behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Evidence has suggested that the TAS2R38 PAV haplotype is associated with the perception of higher concentrations of PROP, whereas the CA6 A allele is relevant to sensing lower PROP concentrations [16]. However, a subsequent study reported that the variant CAVI was only associated with fungiform papilla density, whereas T2R38 modified bitterness sensing [32]. In addition to those observations regarding bitterness sensing, the present study adds more evidence for the combined effect of both T2R38 and CAVI in disease etiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects who gave lower intensity ratings to PROP solutions than those to NaCl were classified as PROP non-tasters, those who gave similar ratings to the two stimuli were classified as medium tasters, and those who gave higher ratings to PROP than to NaCl were classified as super-tasters. After a 1-hour period for recovering, the assignment of each subject to a PROP taster group (super-taster, medium taster, or non-taster) was validated using the impregnated paper screening test3336. This method is based on the ratings of two 2 paper disks, one impregnated with NaCl (1.0 mol/l) and the other with PROP solution (50 mmol/1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals can be classified as PROP non-tasters, medium-tasters or super-tasters using well-established screening and classification by psychophysical methods3313233343536. Non-tasters are subjects who detect PROP only at high concentrations, or not at all, medium-tasters are those who perceive PROP as moderately bitter, while super-tasters are subjects who experience intense bitter sensation from the compound, even at very low concentrations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%