The herd, a source of flexibility for livestock farming systems faced with uncertainties?

Abstract

'Adapt to endure' has become a necessity in agriculture, but the means to do so remain largely undefined. The aim of this literature review is to analyse how the herd contributes to a livestock farming system's capacity to adapt to a changing world and evolve when the future is uncertain. We identify six categories of elements linked to the herd, called 'sources of flexibility', that are used to manage perturbation. The first three are: using the animal's adaptive capacities, using the diversity of species and breeds and combining the diversity of animal products. The last three are: organising the mobility of animals and livestock farmers, juggling the herd numbers and mastering the balance between productivity and herd survival. These sources of flexibility are described in the literature by studying the different ways in which they are used. For example, the 'juggle herd numbers' source is described by volume, categories of animals, type of transfer, such as births, purchases or gifts, and timing of use, especially linked to the timing of the perturbation. Identified studies also compare or rank sources and analyse the connections between them. The flexibility framework (management science) is used for this analysis according to the levels of organisation of a livestock farming system: a strategic level referring to long-term options and to the capacity to modify the system structure, and an operational level referring to adjustment decisions during the productive cycle, the presence or absence of intervention by the livestock farmer, and the time scales involved. We conclude that the decision to use one or another source (in terms of modalities, alternatives, scheduling and combinations) is made according to the production objectives, the structural means, the type/frequency/intensity of perturbations and the context/environment. Consequently, the flexibility of a livestock farming system cannot be assessed in absolute terms. Enhancing flexibility needs management of all elements and scales involved (and not only the herd), and requires diversity to be organised at different scales.

Management flexibility of a grassland agroecosystem: A modeling approach based on viability theory

“…Conversely, the flexible strategy is an approach aimed at high levels of production where overgrazing is very likely to occur (low resistance) and constant adaptations are necessary to maintain system viability. These findings correspond to two of three principles described by Nozières et al (2011) on which a farmer builds the adaptive capacity of their system: overcapacity (pushing the system in sub-optimal situations) and adaptive management (in the sense of Holling, 1973). Their review however leaves largely unanswered the question of how to choose between adaptive management and overcapacity.…”

Adaptive capacity of female rabbits submitted to a change in breeding practices

“…Animal coping processes have been well studied in extensive ruminant production systems because they are weakly controlled by farmers and are subject to fluctuating nutritional resources that challenge the adaptive ability of the animals (Blanc et al, 2010). Another way is to adapt herd management as a source of flexibility for farming systems (Nozières et al, 2011). Monogastric animals are generally less subject to seasonal variations in climate and food resource fluctuations than ruminants because they are usually reared indoors and the breeder controls their environment and food intake.…”

A method for assessing work productivity and flexibility in livestock farms

“…and external (climatic hazards) events. These criteria are able to qualify the adaptive capacities of livestock farms, which have become a key issue for farm sustainability because of the growing uncertainties involved (Darnhofer et al, 2010;Noziè res et al, 2011).…”