2016
DOI: 10.1175/jpo-d-14-0259.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of a Variable Mixing Efficiency on the Abyssal Overturning

Abstract: Manuscript (non-LaTeX) Click here to download Manuscript (non-LaTeX): Full manuscript_mod2.docx ABSTRACT 24In studies of ocean mixing, it is generally assumed that small-scale turbulent overturns lose 15-26 20 % of their energy in eroding the background stratification. Accumulating evidence that this energy fraction, or mixing efficiency R f , significantly varies depending on flow properties 28 challenges this assumption, however. Here, we examine the implications of a varying mixing and including the effect … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
89
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
8
89
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The different spatial distribution of the internal tide and lee-wave energy input is largely responsible for the sensitivity described in Melet et al (2014), highlighting the previously reported importance of the patchiness of internal wave-driven mixing in the ocean (e.g., Simmons et al 2004a;Jayne 2009;Friedrich et al 2011). Using a hydrographic climatology and a similar parameterization for lee wave-driven mixing, Nikurashin and Ferrari (2013) and De Lavergne et al (2016) also show substantial water mass transformation in the Southern Ocean due to internal lee wave-driven mixing. Trossman et al (2013Trossman et al ( , 2016 implemented an inline wave drag parameterization (for both propagating and nonpropagating lee waves) from the atmospheric community (Garner 2005) into a high-resolution ocean general circulation model (Fig.…”
Section: Internal Lee Waves Theory and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The different spatial distribution of the internal tide and lee-wave energy input is largely responsible for the sensitivity described in Melet et al (2014), highlighting the previously reported importance of the patchiness of internal wave-driven mixing in the ocean (e.g., Simmons et al 2004a;Jayne 2009;Friedrich et al 2011). Using a hydrographic climatology and a similar parameterization for lee wave-driven mixing, Nikurashin and Ferrari (2013) and De Lavergne et al (2016) also show substantial water mass transformation in the Southern Ocean due to internal lee wave-driven mixing. Trossman et al (2013Trossman et al ( , 2016 implemented an inline wave drag parameterization (for both propagating and nonpropagating lee waves) from the atmospheric community (Garner 2005) into a high-resolution ocean general circulation model (Fig.…”
Section: Internal Lee Waves Theory and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…When considering the case for the oceans, δ/D=0.1 in Figure provides corresponding STF‐generated κρ and R f values of 2×106normalm2/s and 0.95, respectively. This suggests that the contribution from STF to the mixing rate in the oceans is 1 order of magnitude smaller than the measured value of O(105normalm2/s) for the ocean interior and that the corresponding mixing efficiency is much larger than the empirical value of 0.17 for the real ocean (de Lavergne et al, ; Osborn, ). This implies that mixing in the oceanic interior must be dominated by energies from other sources such as winds and tides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In a steady state, a portion of the APE is converted to kinetic energy that is mostly dissipated into heat via viscosity, while the remainder is allocated to mixing, which is proportional to the strength of the stratification characterized by the buoyancy frequency N (= [g/ρ0(ρ/z)]1/2). In terms of energy per unit time, this balance can be expressed as GAPE=ϵ+κρN2, where G APE is the generation rate of the APE, ϵ is the rate of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation (Barkan et al, ; de Lavergne et al, ; Gayen et al, ; Peltier & Caulfield, ; Tailleux, ), the proportionality constant κρ is known as the mixing rate (i.e., the vertical/diapycnal diffusivity), and denotes a spatial average over the whole volume. The mixing efficiency can be defined as Rf=κρN2/GAPE, which is the fraction of the APE used for mixing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the overturning rate may be sensitive to the uncertainty in q ( x , y ) and to the specific values of Γ * and Reb* used in the parameterization of Γ( Re b ), both of which are discussed in the supporting information. The overturning rate is also sensitive to the vertical function of energy dissipation (e.g., De Lavergne et al, , ). Stratification‐dependent decay functions have been proposed (e.g., Polzin, ), but the exponential decay function with an e ‐folding scale of 500 m used here (equation ) has been shown to match well with observations of turbulence in the deep ocean (St Laurent et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%