2018
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaa89a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Crustal Magnetic Fields on the Thermal Structure of the Martian Upper Atmosphere

Abstract: Using the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution Neutral Gas and Ion Mass Spectrometer data, we investigate the possible impact of crustal magnetic fields on the thermal structure of the Martian upper atmosphere. Our analysis reveals a clear enhancement in temperature over regions with strong crustal magnetic fields during two deep dip campaigns covering the periods of April 17-22 and September 2-8, both in 2015. Several controlling factors, such as solar EUV irradiance, relative atomic O abundance, and non-mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since photoelectrons also play a crucial role in the local energy balance of both neutrals and thermal electrons, we expect enhanced neutral and electron temperatures encountered near magnetic anomalies as well. The observation of enhanced neutral temperature was reported by Cui et al (2018) with the aid of the NGIMS data acquired during several DD campaigns (see also Leblanc et al 2006), but these authors argued that photoelectron trapping was unlikely to be a viable mechanism since the difference in photoelectron impact heating between regions with and without strong crustal magnetic fields was far insufficient to account for the difference in neutral temperature. Meanwhile, Flynn et al (2017) showed that regions over magnetic anomalies featured low electron temperatures, in contrast to our ideal expectation.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since photoelectrons also play a crucial role in the local energy balance of both neutrals and thermal electrons, we expect enhanced neutral and electron temperatures encountered near magnetic anomalies as well. The observation of enhanced neutral temperature was reported by Cui et al (2018) with the aid of the NGIMS data acquired during several DD campaigns (see also Leblanc et al 2006), but these authors argued that photoelectron trapping was unlikely to be a viable mechanism since the difference in photoelectron impact heating between regions with and without strong crustal magnetic fields was far insufficient to account for the difference in neutral temperature. Meanwhile, Flynn et al (2017) showed that regions over magnetic anomalies featured low electron temperatures, in contrast to our ideal expectation.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These measurements were recently used to examine the ionization balance (Mendillo et al 2017) and thermal structure (Cui et al 2018) in the Martian upper atmosphere. The line-ofsight optical depth for photoabsorption at EUV/X-ray is typically smaller than unity for a nominal MAVEN orbit, with extinction not exceeding 5% near the periapsis as long as the portion of the orbit below 250km remains sunward of 60°.…”
Section: Calculation Of Ionization Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the neutral temperature is obtained from the isothermal fitting to the respective CO 2 densities measured by the NGIMS in the Closed Source Neutral mode (Mahaffy, Benna, Elrod, et al, ). Only the inbound NGIMS data are used to avoid possible contamination by wall adsorption and chemistry (Cui et al, ). The above parameterization of the ion temperature is likely subject to considerable uncertainties, but these uncertainties should not be important for the purpose of the present study due to the dominance of the magnetic pressure gradient force (see below).…”
Section: Force Balance and Implications On Bulk Ion Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spherical nature of the atmosphere is taken into full account (Smith & Smith, ). Only the inbound portion of each orbit is included to avoid contamination by possible reactions on the NGIMS antechamber walls (e.g., Cui et al, ). The photoionization rate profiles obtained for all orbits are then combined to construct the median distribution of the photoionization rate with respect to altitude and SZA for each of the four geophysical conditions.…”
Section: Implications On Plasma Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%