2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of diet on the quality of fresh meat and smoked ham in goat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

12
20
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
12
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the a w decreased successively from the slaughter to the salting and from there to the end of ripening period with a w values significantly different between sheep and goat, 0.87 and 0.83 respectively. The values found were similar to those found by several authors: for meat cured products from different species (Paleari, Moretti, Beretta, Mentasti, & Bersani, 2003) including the goat bresaola although with an pH value higher (6.48); for smoked goat ham (Ivanovic, Nesic, Pisinov, & Pavlovic, 2016); for goat and sheep meat cured mantas (Oliveira et al, 2014); as well for sheep and goat cured legs submitted at different ripenning periods (Tolentino et al, 2016) or also for beef cecina (Molinero et al, 2008). The pH and aw values found for us showed that could be an important role in controlling the meat spoiling promoting safety and shelf life stability of the products with respect to microbial growth.…”
Section: Physicochemical Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Also the a w decreased successively from the slaughter to the salting and from there to the end of ripening period with a w values significantly different between sheep and goat, 0.87 and 0.83 respectively. The values found were similar to those found by several authors: for meat cured products from different species (Paleari, Moretti, Beretta, Mentasti, & Bersani, 2003) including the goat bresaola although with an pH value higher (6.48); for smoked goat ham (Ivanovic, Nesic, Pisinov, & Pavlovic, 2016); for goat and sheep meat cured mantas (Oliveira et al, 2014); as well for sheep and goat cured legs submitted at different ripenning periods (Tolentino et al, 2016) or also for beef cecina (Molinero et al, 2008). The pH and aw values found for us showed that could be an important role in controlling the meat spoiling promoting safety and shelf life stability of the products with respect to microbial growth.…”
Section: Physicochemical Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In the two products the L*, b* and a* values decreased from the slaughter until the end of ripening period as was expected along the decrease of a w and as a result of salt action causing losses water and reduction of myoglobin concentrations. Similar situation was found by Ivanovic et al (2016) evaluating the evolution of color of fresh goat meat to smoked ham. The low values of b* in our products compared with similar products from other species mainly pork ham could be due to the low fat level of goat and sheep cured legs, 6 and 7.9% respectively as it was shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Physicochemical Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations