The Impact of Mud Infiltration on Wellbore Stability in Fractured Rock Masses

Abstract

Wellbore stability analysis has been included at the well planning stage of many operating companies for its beneficial effect on improvement of drilling efficiency and cost. Such analysis can be very complex and time-consuming due to numerous factors contributing to borehole instability. As such, many wellbore stability analyses take only a few of the factors into account and are mainly based on continuum mechanics. In addition to the detrimental effect of bedding planes and fractures on borehole stability, the rock masses will become more prone to wellbore instability along fractures penetrated by mud due to reduction in the fracture friction angle. However, very few wellbore stability analyses consider the impact of friction angle reduction of fractures when they are infiltrated with mud. Analyses without considering these factors may yield significant errors and misleading predictions. In this paper, coupled numerical analyses, using UDEC, are presented to investigate the impact of mud infiltration into fractures on wellbore stability under both isotropic and anisotropic stress states. A symmetric regular fracture geometry is considered in the analyses. A simplified, but reasonably realistic, approach is developed to take into account the friction angle reduction of the fractures that occurs when infiltrated with mud. This approach evaluates the extent of mud infiltration and reduces the friction angle of fractures located in the mud-infiltrated region accordingly. The domain of mud infiltration can be either circular or elliptical around the wellbore, which covers both isotropic and general stress conditions. Introduction Maintaining a stable borehole is one of the major problems encountered in the oil and gas industry. Wellbore instability-related problems have a severe impact on drilling schedule and budget, with estimates suggesting that in excess of US$1 billion is lost each year due to the problems1. Wellbore stability analysis has therefore been included at the well planning stage of many operating companies. Numerous factors, including trajectory of the wellbore, orientation and magnitude of the in-situ stress field, rock mechanical and strength properties, in-situ and induced pore pressures, mud pressure, bedding planes and fractures, contribute to wellbore instability2. Furthermore, mud infiltrated into the fractures may interact with reactive formations/infill materials and/or lubricate the fractures which can lead to a reduction in the fracture friction angle. As a result, the rock masses are more prone to wellbore instability along the fractures. As a result of the above, wellbore stability study can be very complex and time-consuming. Consequently, many wellbore stability analyses take only a few of the factors into account and mainly based on continuum mechanics. Few records of numerical analyses to investigate wellbore behaviour in fractured rock masses can be found in the literature, especially with friction angle reduction of the fractures when they are infiltrated with mud. Santarelli et al.3, Zhang et al.4 and Zhang and Roegiers5 conducted a relatively comprehensive study of wellbore behaviour in fractured rock masses. However, no mud infiltration mechanism, which is believed to be critical in the rock masses, is considered in their studies.

Chemical Effect on Wellbore Instability of Nahr Umr Shale

“…In order to prevent the wellbore instability of Nahr Umr Shale, we come up with the following drilling technology countermeasures and suggestions. Depending only on the drilling fluid density cannot solve the wellbore stability of the shale formation which is full of fractures [ 22 , 23 ]. If the drilling density is too high, the pore pressure would increase and the effective stresses around the wellbore decrease, and this would cause a larger damaged scale.…”

Integration of real-time data and past experiences for reducing operational problems

“…One of the main causes of the poor hole cleaning is cavings production. It is estimated that this problem costs the oil industry one billion U.S. dollars a year [10]. According to many sources in the industry, hole cleaning problems are responsible for an extra 10 to 15 % of the drilling costs.…”

Stressed-Shale Drilling Strategy—Water-Activity Design Improves Drilling Performance

“…12 that the mud hydrostatic pressure is greater than the pore pressure. If the difference between mud pressure and pore pressure exceeds the threshold pressure, the synthetic-based fluids might invade the microfractures, which may reduce the internal friction angle and destabilize the wellbore (Hale et al 1992;Labenski et al 2003;Chen et al 2002;Al-Bazali et al 2005). Therefore, in stressed-shale formations, the mudweight increase would have negative consequences on wellbore stability (Santarelli et al 1992).…”